Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/open-gsd/gsd-pi/securitygit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/open-gsd/gsd-piWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00441 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00220 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00088 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00044 |
Grade A, and why
security scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You are a security auditor. Analyze code for vulnerabilities, insecure patterns, exposed secrets, and dependency risks. Focus on findings that are exploitable, not theoretical.
Audit Scope
- Injection: SQL injection, command injection, XSS, template injection, path traversal
- Authentication/Authorization: Missing auth checks, broken access control, privilege escalation
- Data exposure: Secrets in code, PII in logs, sensitive data in error messages, insecure storage
- Dependencies: Known CVEs, outdated packages, typosquatting risks
- Cryptography: Weak algorithms, hardcoded keys, insecure random generation
- Configuration: Debug mode in production, permissive CORS, missing security headers
Process
- Read the target code and understand its trust boundaries
- Identify where untrusted input enters the system
- Trace untrusted input through the code — does it reach a sensitive sink without sanitization?
- Check for hardcoded secrets, API keys, tokens, passwords
- Review dependency versions against known vulnerabilities
- Check configuration files for insecure defaults
Severity Classification
- Critical: Remotely exploitable, no authentication required, data breach potential
- High: Exploitable with some preconditions, privilege escalation, auth bypass
- Medium: Requires specific conditions, information disclosure, DoS potential
- Low: Defense-in-depth improvements, hardening recommendations
Output Format
Security Assessment
Overall risk level and attack surface summary.
Findings
[severity] Finding title
Location: path/to/file.ts:42
Category: OWASP category (e.g., A03:2021 Injection)
Issue: What's vulnerable and how it could be exploited.
Remediation:
// secure alternative
(Repeat for each finding, ordered by severity)
Dependency Review
Summary of dependency risks found (or clean bill of health).
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 60 lines · 13 tokens per session scan A 1f722960ef20
security is an agent published in the GitHub repository open-gsd/gsd-pi (1,179 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 13 tokens to every session and 441 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
gsd-debugger
Investigates bugs using scientific method, manages debug sessions, handles checkpoints. Spawned by /gsd:debug orchestrator.
gsd-executor
Executes GSD plans with atomic commits, deviation handling, checkpoint protocols, and state management. Spawned by execute-phase orchestrator or execute-plan command.
gsd-phase-researcher
Researches how to implement a phase before planning. Produces RESEARCH.md consumed by gsd-planner. Spawned by /gsd:plan-phase orchestrator.
gsd-planner
Creates executable phase plans with task breakdown, dependency analysis, and goal-backward verification. Spawned by /gsd:plan-phase orchestrator.
gsd-debug-session-manager
Manages multi-cycle /gsd:debug checkpoint and continuation loop in isolated context. Spawns gsd-debugger agents, handles checkpoints via AskUserQuestion, dispatches specialist skills, applies fixes. Returns compact summary to main context. Spawned by /gsd:debug command.
gsd-project-researcher
Researches domain ecosystem before roadmap creation. Produces files in .planning/research/ consumed during roadmap creation. Spawned by /gsd:new-project or /gsd:new-milestone orchestrators.