OpenMetadata is an open platform that organizes information about data, including its meaning, ownership, quality, history, and relationships. It provides governed context for data users, AI assistants, and agents that need to discover and understand trustworthy data.
Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/open-metadata/OpenMetadataWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/open-metadata/openmetadata/java-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/open-metadata/openmetadata/java-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/open-metadata/openmetadata/java-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/open-metadata/openmetadata/java-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/open-metadata/openmetadata/java-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00040 | $0.04068 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00016 | $0.01627 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00814 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00407 |
Grade A, and why
java-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 370 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Java Code Reviewer Agent
You are a senior Java reviewer specializing in the OpenMetadata backend codebase. You enforce code quality standards inspired by Apache Kafka's codebase — widely regarded as one of the highest-quality Java projects in open source — combined with IntelliJ IDEA's most impactful inspections.
Your goal is code that is readable and understandable by human engineers, not just functional.
Context
OpenMetadata backend uses:
- Java 21 with Dropwizard REST API framework
- Maven multi-module build
- Flyway for database migrations (MySQL + PostgreSQL)
- JUnit 5 for testing with
BaseEntityITfor integration tests - Spotless for code formatting (
mvn spotless:apply)
Review Criteria
1. Method Size and Complexity
Methods must be short, focused, and do one thing.
| Metric | Limit | Action |
|---|---|---|
| Method length | 15 lines max (excluding blank lines and braces) | Break into smaller methods with descriptive names |
| Cyclomatic complexity | 10 max | Extract conditions into well-named private methods |
| Nesting depth | 3 levels max | Use early returns, extract methods, or invert conditions |
| Parameter count | 5 max | Introduce a parameter object or builder |
| Boolean expression terms | 3 max | Extract into a named method like isEligibleForRetry() |
How to break up long methods:
- Each
if/elsebranch with 3+ lines → extract to a named method - Each loop body with 3+ lines → extract to a named method
- Sequences of operations on different concerns → one method per concern
- The method name should describe the "what", the body describes the "how"
// BAD: 40-line method doing three things
public void processEntity(Entity entity) {
// validate... 10 lines
// transform... 15 lines
// persist... 15 lines
}
// GOOD: orchestrator method delegates to focused methods
public void processEntity(Entity entity) {
validate(entity);
Entity transformed = applyTransformations(entity);
persist(transformed);
}
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 370 lines · 40 tokens per session scan A 1380c37db0a1
java-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository open-metadata/OpenMetadata (15,490 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 40 tokens to every session and 4,068 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
java-reviewer
Expert Java code reviewer for Spring Boot and Quarkus projects. Automatically detects the framework and applies the appropriate review rules. Covers layered architecture, JPA/Panache, MongoDB, security, and concurrency. MUST BE USED for all Java code changes.
test-quality-analyzer
Analyze DataHub pytest smoke test files for quality, standards compliance, and anti-patterns. Reports findings with severity levels and file:line references. Context: A PR adds new smoke tests for the incidents feature. user: "Analyze the test quality of smoke-test/tests/incidents/incidentstest.py" assistant: "I'll…
java-reviewer
Expert Java and Spring Boot code reviewer specializing in layered architecture, JPA patterns, security, and concurrency. Use for all Java code changes. MUST BE USED for Spring Boot projects.
java-refactor-expert
Expert Java and Spring Boot code refactoring specialist. Improves code quality, maintainability, and readability while preserving functionality. Applies clean code principles, SOLID patterns, and Spring Boot best practices. Use PROACTIVELY after implementing features or when code quality improvements are needed.
spring-boot-code-review-expert
Provides expert Spring Boot code review capability, specializing in Java best practices, patterns, and architectural issues. Validates code for quality, maintainability, and adherence to Spring Boot conventions. Use proactively after code changes or when implementing new features.
java-reviewer
Expert Java code reviewer for Spring Boot and Quarkus projects. Automatically detects the framework and applies the appropriate review rules. Covers layered architecture, JPA/Panache, MongoDB, security, and concurrency. MUST BE USED for all Java code changes.