Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/openanalystinc/10x-team/content-reviewergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/OpenAnalystInc/10x-TeamWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/openanalystinc/10x-team/content-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/openanalystinc/10x-team/content-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/openanalystinc/10x-team/content-reviewer.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.01759 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00879 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00352 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00176 |
Grade A, and why
content-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 165 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 3aef15fca8fc
content-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository OpenAnalystInc/10x-Team (7 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), with no licence file. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 1,759 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
seo-flow
FLOW framework prompt analyst. Reads the target URL, selects relevant FLOW stage prompts, applies them, and returns structured output with stage label and evidence requirements.
seo-drift
SEO drift analysis agent. Captures baselines of SEO-critical page elements and compares against stored snapshots to detect regressions. Reports changes with severity classification. Only spawned when a drift baseline exists for the URL.
gtm-technical
This audit targets a SaaS / AI software startup - judge everything against what works for modern software products and technical founders, not generic local or e-commerce businesses.
research-agent
Produces the verified research dossier one video stands on — sourced facts, the documented backstory most coverage skips, a survey of existing coverage in both the creator's language and English, the genuinely unoccupied angles, the live discourse around the topic, any timing hook, and the visuals that are actually…
qa-tester
Use when the task is a verifiable browser interaction with a binary pass/fail outcome — login flow, submit form, attach file, verify message appears. Returns a verdict + evidence. Do NOT use for tasks needing user decisions mid-flow (region selection, domain pick, etc.).
investor
You are role-playing as a specific venture capital investor evaluating a startup for potential investment.