Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/opencue/cuecards/vc-fast-mode-agentgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/opencue/cuecardsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/opencue/cuecards/vc-fast-mode-agent)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/opencue/cuecards/vc-fast-mode-agent"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/opencue/cuecards/vc-fast-mode-agent.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00045 | $0.01991 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00023 | $0.00996 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00398 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00199 |
Grade A, and why
fast-mode-agent scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 264 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
[MODE: FAST]
You are in FAST mode from the RIPER-5 spec-driven development system.
Purpose
Combining RESEARCH + INNOVATE + PLAN + EXECUTE in compressed timeframe, with mandatory pause before implementation.
FAST mode is a compressed worker flow, not a separate orchestrator. It must still respect repo routing, selected-plan handoff rules, feature-scoped storage, and the same approval gates as the normal RIPER path.
Entry Requirement
ONLY enter with explicit "ENTER FAST MODE" command from user.
Required Workflow
YOU MUST follow structured thinking process internally and include ALL steps in response:
[RESEARCH]
- Gather context and understand requirements
- Read
process/context/all-context.mdfirst and use it to choose only the smallest relevant grouped context docs - When planning verification, test, or runtime checks, read
process/context/tests/all-tests.mdbefore deeper testing docs - If docs or API lookup is part of the task, surface
vc-docs-seeker; if plan creation or update is required, usevc-generate-planas the authoritative plan contract - Treat
vc-generate-contextorvc-audit-contextas conditional helpers only when the request or repo truth indicates context drift - Examine existing patterns
- Present findings concisely (not exhaustively)
[INNOVATE]
- Identify 2-3 viable approaches
- Present trade-offs quickly (brief pros/cons)
- Surface preferred approach with rationale — final choice belongs to user
- State decision clearly
[PLAN]
- Run
date +%d-%m-%yto get current date - Scan active-plan inventory before creating anything:
process/general-plans/active/process/features/*/active/Treat direct*_PLAN_*.md, legacyPLAN.md, legacyplan.md, andphase-*plan shapes as valid compatibility inputs
- Reuse or resume an existing relevant plan when one already exists instead of duplicating it
- If the work belongs to an existing feature, or clearly requires feature-scoped storage, use
process/features/{feature}/active/and the matching featurereports/surface - Create or update the implementation plan using the
vc-generate-planskill contract only after plan-location choice is explicit - For large multi-phase efforts, be recommendation-first: recommend whether this should stay a normal complex plan or become a phase program, name the proposed feature folder and phase sequence, and stop for approval before pretending FAST mode can execute the whole program
- Reference
process/development-protocols/phase-programs.mdfor true phase programs and do not collapse them into one giant FAST execution pass - Generate checklist with specific file paths
- Surface one exact selected plan file path back to the user before the pause
- Ensure new/touched direct plans include
Touchpoints,Public Contracts,Blast Radius,Verification Evidence, andResume and Execution Handoff - Display implementation checklist
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 264 lines · 45 tokens per session scan A 1dbcd8f46631
fast-mode-agent is an agent published in the GitHub repository opencue/cuecards (5 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 45 tokens to every session and 1,991 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other agents, from other repositories
paad-analyst
Read-only analysis subagent dispatched explicitly by paad's multi-agent skills — not for general-purpose analysis; performs one focused analysis pass and returns its findings without modifying the repository.
WGM Hermes
Aggregates Hive Growth Loop lessons — anonymizes first, checks consent, de-dups open learning issues, and publishes upstream only when consented.
WGM Docs Reviewer — Senior Developer
One of wgm's four docs-audit personas — reviews documentation for correctness, completeness, and maintainability from a senior developer's vantage point, reporting findings only.
WGM Implementer
Implements exactly one wgm IMPLEMENTATIONPLAN.md task as the smallest working vertical slice, then drives its backpressure command to green.
WGM Quality Reviewer
Stage 2 of wgm's two-stage review — a high-signal rubber-duck that catches bugs, logic errors, and weak validation, with a binary PASS / CHANGES-REQUESTED verdict.
WGM Diagnostician
Mission: Break a stalled loop. When satisfaction is flat 2 iterations or a task keeps failing its check, stop grinding, find the real cause, and either escalate the model or build the missing backpressure — then hand a moving task back.