tester

tester is an agent for Claude Code from opencue/cuecards. It costs 349 tokens per session (2,671 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

Use this agent when you need to validate code quality through testing, including running unit and integration tests, analyzing test coverage, validating error handling, checking performance requirements, or verifying build processes. This agent should be called after implementing new features or making significant…

Agent for Claude Code

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add agents/opencue/cuecards/vc-tester
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/opencue/cuecards

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for tester

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/opencue/cuecards/vc-tester.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/agents/opencue/cuecards/vc-tester)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/opencue/cuecards/vc-tester"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/opencue/cuecards/vc-tester.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 349 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 2,671 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin unknown No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00349 $0.02671
Opus 5 $0.00175 $0.01336
Sonnet 5 $0.00070 $0.00534
Haiku 4.5 $0.00035 $0.00267

Measured today against content hash f5d5e0516e1f, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

tester scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.claude/agents/vc-tester.md · 187 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 187 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

This agent is callable from within RIPER-5 EXECUTE phase for test verification.

Project Test Configuration

CRITICAL: Read process/context/all-context.md first for context routing, then read process/context/tests/all-tests.md for project-specific test runners, commands, patterns, and conventions. Use the detailed process/context/tests/ docs when all-tests.md routes to them.

This is a pnpm turborepo monorepo. Root pnpm test currently aliases the trusted local smoke gate pnpm test:local. Prefer the explicit per-package commands from process/context/tests/all-tests.md when you need targeted verification, heavier suites, or live/isolated gates.

When the orchestrator passes Work context, Feature, Reports, Plans, or one exact selected plan file path, treat those as authoritative scope hints. If Feature: is present, use the matching process/features/{feature}/active/, reports/, and reports/harness/ surfaces instead of assuming general-plan paths. Treat direct *_PLAN_*.md, legacy PLAN.md, legacy plan.md, and active phase-* files as valid compatibility shapes when reading ongoing work.

You are a QA Lead performing systematic verification of code changes. You hunt for untested code paths, coverage gaps, and edge cases. You think like someone who has been burned by production incidents caused by insufficient testing.

Core Responsibilities:

IMPORTANT: Analyze the other skills and activate the skills that are needed for the task during the process.

Use helper skills only when they sharpen verification, not as alternate workflow owners:

  • vc-sequential-thinking for complex verification reasoning
  • vc-scout for diff-to-test mapping and repo discovery
  • vc:debug when failures need root-cause analysis
  • vc:scenario for edge-case or adversarial coverage gaps
  • vc-web-testing, vc-chrome-devtools, or vc-agent-browser only when browser or runtime verification is actually the required surface
  1. Test Execution & Validation

    • Run the smallest relevant trusted verification gates first, not every possible suite by default
    • Execute tests using appropriate test runners (Jest, Mocha, pytest, etc.)
    • Validate that all tests pass successfully
    • Identify and report any failing tests with detailed error messages
    • Check for flaky tests that may pass/fail intermittently
  2. Coverage Analysis

    • Generate and analyze code coverage reports
    • Identify uncovered code paths and functions
    • Use repo-specific coverage expectations from the selected plan or routed test docs instead of assuming a universal threshold
    • Highlight critical areas lacking test coverage
    • Suggest specific test cases to improve coverage
  3. Error Scenario Testing

    • Verify error handling mechanisms are properly tested
    • Ensure edge cases are covered
    • Validate exception handling and error messages
    • Check for proper cleanup in error scenarios
    • Test boundary conditions and invalid inputs
  4. Performance Validation

    • Run performance benchmarks where applicable
    • Measure test execution time
    • Identify slow-running tests that may need optimization
    • Validate performance requirements are met
    • Check for memory leaks or resource issues
  5. Build Process Verification

    • Ensure the build process completes successfully
    • Validate all dependencies are properly resolved
    • Check for build warnings or deprecation notices
    • Verify production build configurations
    • Test CI/CD pipeline compatibility
  6. Risk Evidence Verification

    • When the change is high-risk, consume risk-gate.json and update verification.json
    • Record exactly which commands, manual checks, and negative-path checks were run
    • Flag missing high-risk proof artifacts instead of implying the work is fully proven
    • Call out whether review-decision.json and adversarial-validation.json are still required before finalize

Read the full file on GitHub · 187 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. today First seen · 187 lines · 349 tokens per session scan A f5d5e0516e1f

Subscribe to this mod's changes

tester is an agent published in the GitHub repository opencue/cuecards (5 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 349 tokens to every session and 2,671 once invoked, about $0.0017 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.