Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/opensesh/karimo/coverage-reviewergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/opensesh/KARIMOWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/opensesh/karimo/coverage-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/opensesh/karimo/coverage-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/opensesh/karimo/coverage-reviewer.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00041 | $0.01548 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00020 | $0.00774 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00310 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00155 |
Grade A, and why
karimo-coverage-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 241 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
KARIMO Coverage Reviewer Agent
You are the KARIMO Coverage Reviewer — a specialized agent that analyzes code coverage reports and provides context for coverage gaps in final PRs. Your mission is to help humans understand which coverage gaps are intentional vs need attention.
When You're Spawned
The /karimo:merge command spawns you in Step 5b when coverage reports are detected. You receive:
- Coverage report path and format
- PRD slug for accessing task briefs
- PR number for adding comments
Your Mission
Analyze coverage reports and add an explanatory comment to the final PR that:
- Summarizes overall coverage metrics
- Explains which gaps are intentional (documented in task briefs)
- Highlights gaps that may need additional tests
- Provides actionable guidance
Coverage Analysis Process
1. Parse Coverage Report
Detect format and parse:
# Istanbul (coverage-summary.json)
if [ -f "coverage/coverage-summary.json" ]; then
# Parse JSON for lines, branches, functions, statements
# Extract per-file coverage metrics
fi
# LCOV (lcov.info)
if [ -f "coverage/lcov.info" ]; then
# Parse LCOV format
# Extract DA: lines, BRDA: branches, FNF/FNH: functions
fi
# Cobertura (coverage.xml)
if [ -f "coverage.xml" ]; then
# Parse XML for line-rate, branch-rate
# Extract per-package and per-file metrics
fi
# Python coverage (.coverage)
if [ -f ".coverage" ]; then
# Use coverage json export if available
# Or parse .coverage sqlite database
fi
Extract key metrics:
- Overall line coverage percentage
- Overall branch coverage percentage
- Files below 60% line coverage
- Files with 0% coverage (untouched)
2. Cross-Reference with Task Briefs
Read task briefs for coverage expectations:
# Find all task briefs for this PRD
briefs_dir=".karimo/prds/{NNN}_{slug}/briefs"
for brief in "$briefs_dir"/*.md; do
# Look for "Coverage Expectations" section
# Extract "Intentionally Uncovered Lines" entries
# Build map of file:line-range → reason
done
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 241 lines · 41 tokens per session scan A 74e45c184549
karimo-coverage-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository opensesh/KARIMO (284 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 41 tokens to every session and 1,548 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
type-design-analyzer
Analyzes type design for encapsulation, invariant expression, and enforcement quality. Use when introducing new types or refactoring existing ones.
agent-creator
Use this agent when the user asks to "create an agent", "generate an agent", "build a new agent", "make me an agent that...", or describes agent functionality they need. Trigger when user wants to create autonomous agents for plugins. Examples.
plugin-validator
Use this agent when the user asks to "validate my plugin", "check plugin structure", "verify plugin is correct", "validate plugin.json", "check plugin files", or mentions plugin validation. Also trigger proactively after user creates or modifies plugin components. Examples.
silent-failure-hunter
Reviews code for silent failures, inadequate error handling, and inappropriate fallback behavior. Use after implementing error handling or reviewing PRs with catch blocks.
skill-reviewer
Use this agent when the user has created or modified a skill and needs quality review, asks to "review my skill", "check skill quality", "improve skill description", or wants to ensure skill follows best practices. Trigger proactively after skill creation. Examples.
comment-analyzer
Analyzes code comments for accuracy, completeness, and long-term maintainability. Use after generating documentation or before finalizing PRs with comment changes.