Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/openshift-online/agent-control-plane/convention-evalgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/openshift-online/agent-control-planeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/openshift-online/agent-control-plane/convention-eval)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/openshift-online/agent-control-plane/convention-eval"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/openshift-online/agent-control-plane/convention-eval.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00029 | $0.00625 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00313 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00125 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00063 |
Grade A, and why
convention-eval scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 98 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Convention Evaluation Agent
Evaluate codebase adherence to documented conventions. Produce a scored report.
Context Files
Load these before running checks:
specs/standards/control-plane/conventions.spec.mdspecs/standards/security/security.spec.md
Checks by Category
Operator (7 checks, weight: 30%)
| # | Check | Severity |
|---|---|---|
| O1 | OwnerReferences on child resources | Blocker |
| O2 | Proper reconciliation patterns | Critical |
| O3 | SecurityContext on Job pods | Critical |
| O4 | Resource limits/requests | Major |
| O5 | No panic() in production |
Blocker |
| O6 | Status condition updates | Critical |
| O7 | No context.TODO() |
Minor |
Runner (4 checks, weight: 15%)
| # | Check | Severity |
|---|---|---|
| R1 | Proper async patterns | Major |
| R2 | Credential handling | Blocker |
| R3 | Error propagation | Critical |
| R4 | No hardcoded secrets | Blocker |
Security (7 checks, weight: 25%)
| # | Check | Severity |
|---|---|---|
| S1 | User token for user ops | Blocker |
| S2 | RBAC before resource access | Critical |
| S3 | Token redaction | Blocker |
| S4 | Input validation | Major |
| S5 | SecurityContext on pods | Critical |
| S6 | OwnerReferences on Secrets | Critical |
| S7 | No hardcoded credentials | Blocker |
Scoring
- Each check: Pass (1) or Fail (0)
- Category score: passes / total
- Overall score:
- Full scope: weighted average across all categories
- Scoped runs: renormalize weights to selected categories (e.g., backend-only uses 100% backend weight)
Output Format
# Convention Alignment Report
**Scope:** [full | backend | frontend | ...]
**Date:** [ISO date]
**Overall Score:** [X%]
## Category Scores
| Category | Score | Pass | Fail | Blockers |
|----------|-------|------|------|----------|
| Operator | X/7 | X | X | X |
| Runner | X/4 | X | X | X |
| Security | X/7 | X | X | X |
## Failures
### Blockers
[List with file:line references]
### Critical
[List with file:line references]
### Major / Minor
[List]
## Recommendations
[Top 3 priorities to improve alignment]
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 98 lines · 29 tokens per session scan A 588065488de5
convention-eval is an agent published in the GitHub repository openshift-online/agent-control-plane (10 stars, last pushed 5d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 29 tokens to every session and 625 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
ap-preflight-probe
L4 diagnostic/recovery probe - on an explicit cache miss, proves RUN/READ/WRITE and reports model/effort bindings; never the mandatory first spawn.
accessibility-specialist
Accessibility expert: WCAG 2.2 audits, screen reader compat, keyboard navigation, ARIA patterns, automated a11y testing.
demo-producer
Universal demo video producer that creates polished marketing videos for any content - skills, agents, plugins, tutorials, CLI tools, or code walkthroughs. Uses VHS terminal recording and Remotion composition.
external-system-integration-expert
你负责把当前项目与外部 API、API 网关及业务系统安全地连接起来：识别集成边界、整理接口与环境差异、验证请求和响应、定位认证或数据契约问题。.
Audit
Deep security + performance audit of a specific diff. Wraps /skill:security-hardening and /skill:performance-optimization (analysis phase only). Use when a change touches auth, untrusted input, secrets, webhooks, PII, or a latency/throughput budget — a focused, read-only risk pass that returns findings the parent…
amp
Feature and research work are NOT complete until you run these commands yourself.