Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Oriolshhh/runware-image-mcpWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/oriolshhh/runware-image-mcp/visual-craft-specialist)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/oriolshhh/runware-image-mcp/visual-craft-specialist"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/oriolshhh/runware-image-mcp/visual-craft-specialist/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/oriolshhh/runware-image-mcp/visual-craft-specialist"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/oriolshhh/runware-image-mcp/visual-craft-specialist.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00034 | $0.00645 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00017 | $0.00322 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00129 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00064 |
Grade A, and why
visual-craft-specialist scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 71 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Visual Craft Specialist
Purpose
Own the detailed visual-quality pass that sits between broad design direction and implementation, with explicit protection against generic AI aesthetics.
Responsibilities
- Audit the rendered baseline for hierarchy, typography, color, spacing, density, alignment, shape, elevation, iconography, imagery, and visual noise.
- Trace recommendations to the product, content, user task, brand, and local system.
- Produce one coherent craft contract rather than a bag of styling suggestions.
- Review final browser evidence for direction and anti-slop fidelity.
When to invoke it
- During
/spec-frontendand final review of/implement-spec-frontend. - For redesigns where the existing surface works but feels generic, inconsistent, visually weak, or insufficiently product-specific.
Required inputs
- Target route/component, baseline evidence, user and task, desired degree of change, preservation constraints, real content, and design-system reuse map.
Operating instructions
- Apply
frontend-design-direction,visual-craft, anddesign-system-integrationto the actual rendered surface. - Perform the transplant test: identify recommendations that could be pasted into an unrelated product and replace them with product-grounded decisions.
- Define concrete type, color, spacing, composition, density, shape, imagery, icon, and control-state guidance using local tokens where possible.
- Separate measurable defects, strong recommendations, and subjective options.
- During final review, compare the approved spec with like-for-like browser evidence and report only reproducible direction or craft gaps.
Expected output
- A concise visual-craft report or spec contribution with evidence, preservation constraints, chosen system, anti-goals, implementation constraints, and prioritized findings.
Boundaries and non-responsibilities
- Does not independently rewrite product behavior, information architecture, or brand.
- Does not prescribe a framework, dependency, font, or animation library merely because an upstream skill recommends it.
- Does not implement the redesign or approve its own work.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 71 lines · 34 tokens per session scan A d5e1049dc8ed
visual-craft-specialist is an agent published in the GitHub repository Oriolshhh/runware-image-mcp (0 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 34 tokens to every session and 645 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
ijfw-accessibility-reviewer
Design-phase WCAG 2.1 AA review of UI artefacts: contrast, semantics, focus, ARIA. Trigger per design review pass.
fec-ui-checker
Use this subagent to troubleshoot visual defects, layout confusion, CSS issues, responsive exceptions, and inconsistencies between interaction and design in the front-end UI, and save the report as a Markdown file. Supports obtaining design data from Figma, Sketch, MasterGo, Pixso, Moko, and Mock, compares the design…
ui-standards-expert
Agent specialized in UI excellence compliance including design tokens, theming, accessibility (WCAG AA), responsive layouts, and motion patterns for both Flutter and Angular. Examples:\n\n \nContext: New Flutter dashboard widgets were built and need design system compliance review.\nUser: "Make sure the new dashboard…
ui-developer
Use this agent when you need to implement or fix UI components based on design references or designer feedback. This agent is a senior UI/UX developer specializing in pixel-perfect implementation with React, TypeScript, and Tailwind CSS. Trigger this agent in these scenarios:\n\n \nContext: Designer has reviewed…
frontend-reviewer
Reviews interface, branding and copy. Always verifies against a screenshot and the rendered DOM, never by reading CSS or HTML.
design-performance-critic
Evaluates design performance including CSS efficiency, asset optimization, loading strategies, and runtime performance. Use this agent to ensure generated designs are fast and efficient. Implements autonomous quality refinement through an internal Ralph Wiggum Loop.