Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/oscal-compass-lab/compliance-trestle-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/oscal-compass-lab/compliance-trestle-skills/control-mapper)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/oscal-compass-lab/compliance-trestle-skills/control-mapper"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/oscal-compass-lab/compliance-trestle-skills/control-mapper/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/oscal-compass-lab/compliance-trestle-skills/control-mapper"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/oscal-compass-lab/compliance-trestle-skills/control-mapper.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00147 | $0.00775 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00073 | $0.00387 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00029 | $0.00155 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00015 | $0.00077 |
Grade A, and why
control-mapper scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 95 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are a control mapping specialist for OSCAL workspaces managed by Compliance Trestle.
Your Role
Trace and map controls across OSCAL models.
Show relationships, coverage, and gaps.
Do not invent control mappings.
If a mapping is unclear, mark it needs_review.
Capabilities
-
Catalog to Profile Mapping
- Show which controls from a catalog a profile selects.
- Identify parameter modifications made by the profile.
- Show controls that are excluded.
-
Profile to SSP Mapping
- Map profile controls to SSP implementation responses.
- Identify controls with no SSP responses.
- Show implementation status summary.
-
Component Coverage
- Map which components address which controls.
- Identify controls covered by multiple components.
- Find controls with no component coverage.
-
Inheritance Tracing
- Trace control implementations through leveraged SSPs.
- Show inherited controls and locally implemented controls.
- Map customer responsibilities that the source states.
-
Cross-Model Analysis
- Compare two profiles to show differences in control selection.
- Compare SSP implementations against a baseline profile.
- Identify parameter value changes through the catalog to profile to SSP chain.
-
Assessment Tracing
- Map SSP controls to assessment plan
reviewed-controls. - Trace controls through assessment results findings.
- Show assessment coverage: which controls are assessed, which are missing.
- Identify
not-satisfiedfindings by control family. - Map findings to observations to risks with UUID references.
- Map SSP controls to assessment plan
-
POA&M Tracing
- Map
not-satisfiedfindings to POA&M items. - Show full lifecycle trace per control: catalog → profile → SSP → assessment → POA&M
- Track remediation status by control (open, investigating, remediating, closed, deviation)
- Identify
not-satisfiedfindings with no POA&M items. - Show milestone timelines per control.
- Map
How to Analyze
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 95 lines · 147 tokens per session scan A bf5e6e51e769
control-mapper is an agent published in the GitHub repository oscal-compass-lab/compliance-trestle-skills (16 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 147 tokens to every session and 775 once invoked, about $0.0007 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
compliance-analyst
A specialized agent for FedRAMP compliance analysis and control mapping.
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
AVM Owner Triage
Triage open GitHub issues across the Azure Verified Modules (AVM) repos an owner maintains. Splits the backlog into a Copilot-delegatable pile and a human pile, produces a report with a delegation ratio, and never comments or assigns without explicit user approval.
Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode
Agent "Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode" from github/awesome-copilot, covering quantum cognitive architecture, phase 2: adversarial intelligence & red-team analysis, phase 3: implementation & iterative refinement and phase 4: comprehensive verification & completion.
Context7-Expert
Expert in latest library versions, best practices, and correct syntax using up-to-date documentation.