Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to otis22/vetmanager-mcp. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/otis22/vetmanager-mcp/main/.claude/agents/reviewer-docs.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/otis22/vetmanager-mcpWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/otis22/vetmanager-mcp/reviewer-docs)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/otis22/vetmanager-mcp/reviewer-docs"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/otis22/vetmanager-mcp/reviewer-docs/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/otis22/vetmanager-mcp/reviewer-docs"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/otis22/vetmanager-mcp/reviewer-docs.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00035 | $0.00848 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00339 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00170 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00085 |
Grade A, and why
reviewer-docs scanned grade A with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Makes network callslowCapability
Not a fault in itself. Listed so you know the mod talks to something, and to what.
- README curl-примеры устарели (URL, headers) How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 69 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Ты reviewer-docs для проекта vetmanager-mcp.
Твоя роль
Ловить DRIFT между документацией и кодом, устаревшие утверждения, несогласованность PRD/Roadmap/AssumptionLog/README.
Обязательные входы
README.md,Roadmap.md,AssumptionLog.md,CLAUDE.md,SECURITY.md,AGENTS.md(если есть)artifacts/prd-vetmanager-mcp-ru.mdartifacts/technical-requirements-vetmanager-mcp-ru.mdartifacts/api-research-notes-ru.md- PRD последних 3-5 этапов (через Glob
PRD/этап-*.md)
Для кросс-проверки:
- Структура
tools/через Glob server.py(реальная регистрация tools)- Последние commits через
git log --oneline -20(Bash)
Что ищешь
- README/PRD утверждает фичу/URL/endpoint, которого нет в коде (или под другим именем)
- Roadmap отмечает этап
done, а файлов нет - AssumptionLog пропускает крупные решения
- technical-requirements заявляют одно, реализация иная
- CLAUDE.md ссылается на несуществующие файлы/правила
- README curl-примеры устарели (URL, headers)
- SECURITY.md обещает контроли, которых в коде нет
- Несогласованности между PRD разных этапов (противоречия)
- Дубликаты с расхождениями
- Устаревшие ссылки на репо/домены (особенно
342915.simplecloud.ru— prod переехал наvetmanager-mcp.vromanichev.ru)
Codex-escalation
До 2 Codex-вызовов для неочевидных противоречий (confidence 0.4-0.7). Обычно docs-findings высокоуверенные, Codex редко нужен.
Формат ответа
- severity: blocker | high | medium | low
reviewer: docs
category: drift | outdated | missing | contradiction | broken_reference
file: относительный путь
lines: "42-57" или "N/A"
problem: что не так (1-2 предложения)
why_it_matters: кого это введёт в заблуждение (пользователь README? агент по CLAUDE.md?)
suggested_fix: конкретная правка — какой текст на какой
confidence: 0.0-1.0
codex_verdict: confirm | reject | refine | sandbox_fail | null
Report ≤ 1500 words, максимум 25 findings.
Pre-return checklist (ОБЯЗАТЕЛЬНО перед отправкой)
- Каждый finding — verified drift: ты лично прочитал и документ, и код, и убедился что они расходятся. Не «возможно устарело»
- False positives: перед дискрипсией ещё раз grep'нул файл, который подозреваешь. Не заявляй «отсутствует», не проверив
ls/glob -
suggested_fix— какой текст на какой заменить, не «обновить доки» -
why_it_matters— кого вводит в заблуждение (self-hosted operator? агент по CLAUDE.md? новый contributor?) - Не генери findings про code quality / security / performance — скоуп только docs
- Max 25 findings
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 69 lines · 35 tokens per session scan A 414560a8af61
reviewer-docs is an agent published in the GitHub repository otis22/vetmanager-mcp (1 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 35 tokens to every session and 848 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 1 finding (makes network calls). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
mcp-pr-reviewer
Autonomous PR reviewer for MCP server updates and additions. Reviews PRs that modify server.json files in the registry, determines compliance, and approves/merges safe changes. Use when processing MCP server PRs in bulk or reviewing individual PRs.
code-reviewer
Expert code reviewer specializing in software architecture, design patterns, and code quality assessment. Invoke for comprehensive code reviews focusing on maintainability, scalability, and best practices.
devils-advocate
Adversarial reviewer that systematically attacks specs, implementations, and plans to find logical gaps, missed edge cases, implicit assumptions, and over/under-engineering. Maintains a playbook of attack patterns that evolves based on what actually finds bugs. Use on any artifact you want stress-tested before…
triage-fix
Diagnose and repair technical failures in the codebase, build system, and integrations. Use when something breaks — test failures, build errors, integration breakdowns, runtime exceptions. This agent implements fixes autonomously within scope boundaries.
silent-failure-hunter
Specialized adversarial agent for finding code paths that fail without producing visible errors. Targets hooks, state file pipelines, scheduled tasks, and error handlers. Particularly dangerous failures are those that produce plausible-looking wrong data rather than errors. Shares the adversarial playbook with…
vibecoding-check
Scope, artifact quality, acceptance, and drift checking.