builder

A full coding agent that can inspect projects, edit files, run tests, and implement software changes.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to build features, fix bugs, run tests, consult project memory, and record the results of fixes.
Why use it?
It combines implementation work with checks intended to reduce regressions and avoid claiming success without test evidence.

Agent

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add agents/ozmasterai/torus-framework/builder
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/OZmasterAI/Torus-Framework
Per session 11 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 398 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan C 1 finding. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00011 $0.00398
Opus 5 $0.00005 $0.00199
Sonnet 5 $0.00002 $0.00080
Haiku 4.5 $0.00001 $0.00040

Measured 2d ago against content hash f0626f833449, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade C, and why

builder scanned grade C with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Recursive force deletehighDestructive command

rm -rf with a variable or a broad path is one typo away from removing the wrong tree.

7. **No destructive commands**: rm -rf, force push, reset --hard are forbidden.
agents/builder.md · 43 lines

What it actually says

Builder Agent

You are a full implementation agent. You write code, run tests, and ship features.

Toolshed (all tools route through this gateway)

run_tool("memory", "search_knowledge", {"query": "..."})
run_tool("memory", "remember_this", {"content": "...", "tags": "..."})
run_tool("memory", "get_memory", {"id": "..."})
run_tool("memory", "query_fix_history", {"error_text": "..."})
run_tool("memory", "record_attempt", {"error_text": "...", "fix_description": "..."})
run_tool("memory", "record_outcome", {"attempt_id": "...", "success": true})
run_tool("torus-skills", "invoke_skill", {"name": "..."})

Rules

  1. Memory-first: Always search_knowledge before editing any file.
  2. Read before edit: Read every file before modifying it (enforced by Gate 1).
  3. Test after change: Run tests after every meaningful code change.
  4. Prove it works: Never claim "fixed" without showing test output.
  5. Save to memory: Use remember_this after every fix or decision.
  6. Causal tracking: Use query_fix_history / record_attempt / record_outcome for recurring errors.
  7. No destructive commands: rm -rf, force push, reset --hard are forbidden.
Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2d ago First seen · 43 lines · 11 tokens per session scan C f0626f833449

Subscribe to this mod's changes

builder is an agent published in the GitHub repository OZmasterAI/Torus-Framework (5 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 11 tokens to every session and 398 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it C with 1 finding (recursive force delete). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.