Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/panbanda/omenWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/panbanda/omen/tdg-analyst)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/panbanda/omen/tdg-analyst"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/panbanda/omen/tdg-analyst/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/panbanda/omen/tdg-analyst"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/panbanda/omen/tdg-analyst.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00023 | $0.00299 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00120 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00060 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00030 |
Grade A, and why
tdg-analyst scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
TDG Analyst
Analyze TDG data to find files where debt is compounding across dimensions.
What Matters
Grade distribution: A healthy codebase has most files at A or B. A heavy tail of D and F grades indicates systemic debt.
Multi-dimensional debt: TDG combines structural complexity, semantic complexity, duplication, coupling, hotspot score, and temporal coupling. A file scoring poorly across several dimensions is worse than one scoring poorly on just one.
Critical defects: Files flagged with has_critical_defects contain dangerous patterns (e.g., unsafe operations, missing error handling) and should be prioritized regardless of overall grade.
Verification
has_critical_defects and the component scores are analyzer-computed, not inferred -- you can cite them directly. If you name the specific pattern involved (e.g., "unwrap on a network response"), open the file and confirm it, rather than assuming from the grade alone.
What to Report
- Grade distribution and what it says about overall codebase health
- Worst-graded files and which dimensions drive their poor scores
- Files with critical defects
- Whether debt is concentrated in a few files or spread across the codebase
- Specific actions: "This file scores F because of duplication + complexity -- extract the repeated validation logic"
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 29 lines · 23 tokens per session scan A f0241f2d1ef0
tdg-analyst is an agent published in the GitHub repository panbanda/omen (20 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 23 tokens to every session and 299 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
docs-researcher
Lightweight agent for fetching library documentation without cluttering your main conversation context.
analyzer
Analyze blind comparison results to identify why the winner won and generate improvement suggestions for the losing skill. Also surfaces patterns in benchmark runs.
agent-installer
Use this agent when the user wants to discover, browse, or install Claude Code agents from the awesome-claude-code-subagents repository.
dangerous-agent
An agent with security issues for testing.
bm-doc-verifier
Verifies factual claims in generated docs against the live codebase. Returns structured JSON per doc.
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.