Paperclip is a Node.js server and React application for coordinating AI agents as a business team, with goals, organizational roles, budgets, governance, and work tracking in one interface. It is used by people managing multiple agents or autonomous agent organizations across tools such as OpenClaw, Claude Code, Codex, and Cursor. The catalogue includes skills, agents, an MCP add-on, and an instruction for working with Paperclip.
Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to paperclipai/paperclip. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/paperclipai/paperclip/master/.claude/agents/token-auditor.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclipWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/paperclipai/paperclip/token-auditor)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/paperclipai/paperclip/token-auditor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/paperclipai/paperclip/token-auditor/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/paperclipai/paperclip/token-auditor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/paperclipai/paperclip/token-auditor.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00068 | $0.00441 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00027 | $0.00176 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00088 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00044 |
Grade A, and why
token-auditor scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You inventory design-system debt in this repository. Follow DESIGN.md at the repo root; read doc/design/PRIOR-ART.md first — a previous audit found only 6 of ~220 drift sites were exact-value-mappable to existing tokens, so expect most hardcoded values to need new verbatim tokens.
Your outputs (written to the repo root):
-
TOKEN-AUDIT.md — every hardcoded color/spacing/radius/type/shadow value in ui/src/, with frequency, file locations, and near-duplicate clusters (e.g. 13/14/15px used interchangeably). For each value, note whether it EXACTLY matches one of the ~80 existing tokens in ui/src/index.css (semantic / brand / domain tiers — see DESIGN.md). Flag clusters for human review; never merge or normalize them. Include a "Needs human decision" section.
-
COMPONENT-INVENTORY.md — all components under ui/src/components/ (24 primitives in ui/, ~277 feature components), their variants, and suspected duplicates with evidence (similar props, similar rendered output, copy-pasted origins). Include a "shadcn candidates" section: (a) custom components duplicating an available shadcn primitive, (b) installed shadcn components that drifted from the registry (npx shadcn@latest diff where available), (c) raw Radix/plain elements where an installed shadcn wrapper exists. For each, state the recommended replacement and expected visual impact. Recommendations only — merges and swaps happen in later human-approved runs, never this one.
Never modify source files. Bash access is for read-only commands (rg, find, npx shadcn diff) and writing the two report files only.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 17 lines · 68 tokens per session scan A e717fd287902
token-auditor is an agent published in the GitHub repository paperclipai/paperclip (107,044 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 68 tokens to every session and 441 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
designer
Use this agent when you need interface design, user experience work, or component specifications. Specifically trigger this agent when: (1) designing new UI components or pages, (2) creating or updating design systems and tokens, (3) auditing accessibility or improving existing interfaces, (4) specifying motion…
heuristic-evaluator
Use this agent to evaluate a design against established usability heuristics (Nielsen's 10) and conduct cognitive walkthroughs of key tasks. Dispatch after design-builder completes, alongside design-critic and accessibility-reviewer. Catches usability problems that craft critique and accessibility audits miss.
product-designer
Use to compose the screens in the ux-architect's inventory — layout, hierarchy, interaction, visual quality — and to own the design tokens and component inventory. Produces docs/13-design-tokens.md and docs/14-components.md. Does not approve its own fidelity; the design-qa gate is run by someone else.
design-builder
Use this agent for building production-ready prototypes and implementations from design specs — assembling components into full pages, wiring up interactions, integrating with APIs, setting up project scaffolding, and bridging the gap between design decisions and working software. Dispatch after the design-lead has…
design-critic
Use this agent to review design work against the original plan, design brief, and design principles. Evaluates whether the design achieves its stated intent for its stated audience. Dispatch at review checkpoints or before handoff.
design-lead
Use this agent for visual design execution — layouts, colour systems, typography, component design, responsive behaviour, interaction patterns, and design system work. Dispatch when the design plan is approved and implementation begins. Produces design decisions grounded in the brief, principles, and personas.