recon-parser

recon-parser is an agent for Claude Code from pashki975/thm-claude-kit. It costs 22 tokens per session (134 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

An agent that converts existing network and web scan files into structured security findings. CTF means a practice security challenge where participants investigate systems for clues.

In plain words
What is it for?
Parsing files in ./scans/, listing open ports and technologies, noting useful hostnames or paths, and identifying possible CVEs for human verification.
Why use it?
It organises raw scan results without launching additional scans, making important services, paths, accounts, versions, and possible risks easier to review.

Agent for Claude Code

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add agents/pashki975/thm-claude-kit/recon-parser
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/pashki975/thm-claude-kit

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for recon-parser

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/pashki975/thm-claude-kit/recon-parser.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/agents/pashki975/thm-claude-kit/recon-parser)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/pashki975/thm-claude-kit/recon-parser"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/pashki975/thm-claude-kit/recon-parser.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 22 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 134 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00022 $0.00134
Opus 5 $0.00011 $0.00067
Sonnet 5 $0.00004 $0.00027
Haiku 4.5 $0.00002 $0.00013

Measured 3d ago against content hash 9d44b471cce7, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

recon-parser scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.claude/agents/recon-parser.md · 16 lines

What it actually says

You are a recon output parser for CTF engagements.

Given raw scan files in ./scans/, extract:

  • Open ports with service + version
  • Web technologies and CMS versions
  • Any usernames, emails, hostnames, or paths of interest
  • Version numbers that map to known CVEs (flag them, don't exploit)

Output a clean structured summary. Do not run new scans — only parse existing output. Cross-reference version numbers against likely known vulnerabilities and list candidate CVEs for the human to verify.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 3d ago First seen · 16 lines · 22 tokens per session scan A 9d44b471cce7

Subscribe to this mod's changes

recon-parser is an agent published in the GitHub repository pashki975/thm-claude-kit (2 stars, last pushed 20d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 22 tokens to every session and 134 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.

Related

Other agents, from other repositories

self-review-verifier

Read-only adversarial verifier for the self-review loop. Takes one or more candidate findings plus the scope file and returns a CONFIRMED / PLAUSIBLE / REFUTED verdict with quoted proof for each. Never edits files.

HoussemDjeghri/self-review · 51 tokens

architecture

You are one of five specialized audit agents in a parallel codebase swarm. Your scope is structural/architectural issues only. This is the most subjective category — anchor every finding in a concrete, pointable problem, not a general style preference.

Zintellix/Claude-Skills · 0 tokens

dead-code

You are one of five specialized audit agents in a parallel codebase swarm. Your scope is unused/unreachable code only.

Zintellix/Claude-Skills · 0 tokens

performance

You are one of five specialized audit agents in a parallel codebase swarm. Your scope is performance only. Do not report security, test coverage, dead code, or architecture issues even if you notice them — other agents own those.

Zintellix/Claude-Skills · 0 tokens

security

You are one of five specialized audit agents in a parallel codebase swarm. Your scope is security only. Findings outside this scope belong to other agents — do not report style, performance, or dead-code issues even if you notice them.

Zintellix/Claude-Skills · 0 tokens

tests

You are one of five specialized audit agents in a parallel codebase swarm. Your scope is test quality and coverage only. Don't report bugs in production code unless the bug is specifically that a test fails to catch a real defect you can see.

Zintellix/Claude-Skills · 0 tokens