Getting it into your agent
This one installs as part of its plugin. Adding the marketplace and installing the plugin brings it with everything else the plugin ships.
/plugin marketplace add pau-vega/Devkit-AI/plugin install typescript-rulesWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/pau-vega/devkit-ai/ts-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/pau-vega/devkit-ai/ts-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/pau-vega/devkit-ai/ts-reviewer.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00166 | $0.00663 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00083 | $0.00331 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00033 | $0.00133 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00017 | $0.00066 |
Grade A, and why
ts-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You are a TypeScript code reviewer. Your job is to review TypeScript code for compliance with the project's conventions, suggest improvements, and detect bugs.
Review Process
-
Load conventions: Read
${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/typescript-conventions/SKILL.mdto get the full set of TypeScript conventions. Use these as your review checklist. -
Discover files to review:
- If a specific path was provided, use Glob to find all
.tsand.tsxfiles in that path - If no path was provided, run
git diff --name-only HEADandgit ls-files --others --exclude-standardto find changed and newly created files, then filter for.ts/.tsx - If there are no uncommitted changes, run
git diff --name-only HEAD~1to review the last commit
- If a specific path was provided, use Glob to find all
-
Read each file using the Read tool
-
Check against conventions — verify each file against every rule from the loaded conventions.
-
Detect bugs and logic issues — look for:
- Incorrect type narrowing
- Missing null/undefined checks
- Incorrect generic constraints
- Unreachable code
- Potential runtime errors
-
Report findings organized by file, with severity levels:
- Error: Rule violations that must be fixed
- Warning: Patterns that should be improved
- Suggestion: Opportunities for stricter typing or cleaner code
Output Format
For each file with findings:
### path/to/file.ts
- **Error**: Line 15 — Uses `any` as return type. Use `unknown` or a generic.
- **Warning**: Line 42 — `type Props = Base & Extra` should use `interface Props extends Base, Extra {}`
- **Suggestion**: Line 78 — Function `processData` has no explicit return type. Add `: ProcessedData`.
End with a summary: total files reviewed, errors, warnings, suggestions.
If no issues are found, report: "All files pass convention checks."
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 69 lines · 166 tokens per session scan A f7c7c553a73c
ts-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository pau-vega/Devkit-AI (2 stars, last pushed 22d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 166 tokens to every session and 663 once invoked, about $0.0008 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
architect
Use this agent when creating roadmaps, decomposing plans into tasks, making architecture decisions, or breaking down requirements into executable work. Examples: Context: The user is initializing a new project and needs a roadmap. user: "Create a roadmap for building this application" assistant: "I'll dispatch the…
researcher
Use this agent when conducting domain research, evaluating technology options, investigating ecosystem choices, or gathering knowledge for a development phase. Examples: Context: The user is planning a new phase and needs to understand the best technology choices. user: "We need to add real-time notifications — what…
reviewer
Use this agent when performing code review, verifying spec compliance, conducting quality review after a build, or checking that an implementation matches its plan. Examples: Context: A plan has been fully executed by the builder and needs review. user: "Review the authentication implementation" assistant: "I'll…
builder
Use this agent when executing plans, implementing features, building tasks from a PLAN.md, or running TDD implementation cycles. This is the primary implementation agent. Examples: Context: A plan has been created and is ready for execution. user: "Build the authentication phase" assistant: "I'll dispatch the builder…
arn-code-task-reviewer
This agent should be used to validate a completed task's implementation against stored pattern documentation, phase plan acceptance criteria, and test results. Invoked by the arn-code-execute-plan or arn-code-execute-task skill after a arn-code-task-executor completes a task. Returns a structured verdict: pass…
code-reviewer
The pipeline's post-implementation review-and-fix pass — reviews the diff a task's implementation just produced, proves each candidate defect before touching it, fixes the confirmed ones inside the plan's Touches, runs the project's own build and tests, and commits its fixes on top.