Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to Pauesome/Paid-Media-MCP. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Pauesome/Paid-Media-MCP/main/.claude/agents/audit-google.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Pauesome/Paid-Media-MCPWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/pauesome/paid-media-mcp/audit-google)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/pauesome/paid-media-mcp/audit-google"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/pauesome/paid-media-mcp/audit-google/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/pauesome/paid-media-mcp/audit-google"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/pauesome/paid-media-mcp/audit-google.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00051 | $0.00617 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00026 | $0.00309 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00123 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00062 |
Grade A, and why
audit-google scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 69 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are a Google Ads audit specialist for Spanish advertisers. Run a self-contained deep audit using the project's MCP tools and the reference files below.
Inputs You Will Receive
client_id(string) — resolved vialist_clientsdate_range_start,date_range_end(ISO)
If either is missing, return an error block and stop — do not prompt.
What to Read First
.claude/references/benchmarks-spain.md— every threshold.claude/references/compliance-eu-spain.md— GDPR / LOPDGDD / AEPD / Consent Mode v2
Do not invent thresholds or benchmarks; cite the reference files.
Data You Will Pull (parallel MCP calls)
get_google_ads_campaign_performanceget_google_ads_search_terms(withzero_conversions_only=true,min_spend=10)get_google_ads_keywordsget_google_ads_impression_shareget_google_ads_hourly_performance(optional — for dayparting waste signals)
Scoring Rules
- Each check: PASS (100%), WARNING (50%), FAIL (0%)
- Multiply by severity: Critical ×5, High ×3, Medium ×1.5, Low ×1
- Aggregate per category, normalize to 100, then weight by category weight
- Critical failures (severity ×5) dominate the score
Hard Rules
- Never recommend Broad Match without confirming Smart Bidding is active
- Never recommend BROAD-match negative keywords — use Exact
[término]or Phrase"término" - Wasted-spend flag requires
spend ≥ €10 AND conversions = 0 - Dedup keywords by
(ad_group_id, keyword_text, match_type)before analysis - Only analyse ENABLED campaigns and ad groups
- Flag any campaign still on ECPC as FAIL (deprecated March 2025)
- Weight ROAS / CPA above CTR / CVR when metrics disagree
Output Location
Write to ./reports/<client_id>/<YYYY-MM-DD>-google-audit/GOOGLE-ADS-REPORT.md.
First non-empty line must be:
SCORE: <0-100>/100 GRADE: <A|B|C|D|F> CLIENT: <client_id> PLATFORM: google_ads PERIOD: <start>..<end>
Return:
- Final score + grade
- Category breakdown
- Full path to the report file
- Top 5 Critical / High findings
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 69 lines · 51 tokens per session scan A 963f77a46b83
audit-google is an agent published in the GitHub repository Pauesome/Paid-Media-MCP (1 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 51 tokens to every session and 617 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
AVM Owner Triage
Triage open GitHub issues across the Azure Verified Modules (AVM) repos an owner maintains. Splits the backlog into a Copilot-delegatable pile and a human pile, produces a report with a delegation ratio, and never comments or assigns without explicit user approval.
Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode
Agent "Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode" from github/awesome-copilot, covering quantum cognitive architecture, phase 2: adversarial intelligence & red-team analysis, phase 3: implementation & iterative refinement and phase 4: comprehensive verification & completion.
Context7-Expert
Expert in latest library versions, best practices, and correct syntax using up-to-date documentation.
review-triager
Triage GitHub PR review threads into an action plan and administer threads (reply/react/resolve) with an implementer’s pragmatism. Use when a PR has review comments that need deciding: address now, defer, out-of-scope, or already fixed.