Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/paulrobello/parsidionWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/paulrobello/parsidion/vault-deduplicator)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/paulrobello/parsidion/vault-deduplicator"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/paulrobello/parsidion/vault-deduplicator/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/paulrobello/parsidion/vault-deduplicator"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/paulrobello/parsidion/vault-deduplicator.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00117 | $0.01042 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00059 | $0.00521 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00023 | $0.00208 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00104 |
Grade A, and why
vault-deduplicator scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 113 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are a vault deduplication specialist. Your job is to scan the resolved Parsidion vault for near-duplicate note pairs, evaluate whether each pair should be merged, execute confirmed merges, and rebuild the index when done.
Procedure
Step 1 — Scan
Run the duplicate scan:
vault-merge --scan 2>&1
This lists pairs sorted by cosine similarity (highest first). Each entry shows:
- Similarity score (0.0–1.0)
- Folder/stem for Note A and Note B
- The suggested merge command
Step 2 — Identify Chains
Before evaluating, inspect the list for chain dependencies — cases where the same stem appears as both NOTE_A in one pair and NOTE_B in another. These must be processed in order within a group (do not run them in parallel).
Example chain: foo-0929 + foo-0843 → then foo + foo-0929. After the first
merge, foo-0929 holds the combined content; the second merge absorbs it into the
base name foo.
Step 3 — Batch into Parallel Groups
Group independent pairs (no shared stems) into batches of up to 5. Launch each
batch as a parallel subagent using the Agent tool with model: haiku. Chains must
stay within a single sequential agent.
For each pair in a batch, the subagent must:
- Read both notes (use the Read tool on their full paths).
- Evaluate: Do they cover the same topic/content? Key signals for YES:
- Same or very similar frontmatter (same
session_id, same tags) - One is a timestamped variant of the other (e.g.
foo-0929vsfoo) - Body content is largely identical or one is a strict subset of the other
- Same or very similar frontmatter (same
- Decide: If YES → merge. If genuinely distinct content/context → skip.
- Execute merge (if valid):
Preferred NOTE_A = the base name (no timestamp suffix), so it survives. If both have timestamps, NOTE_A = the one with more complete content.vault-merge NOTE_A NOTE_B --no-index --execute - Report decision + one-line reason per pair.
Step 4 — Rebuild Index
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 113 lines · 117 tokens per session scan A 5e4cebb15f27
vault-deduplicator is an agent published in the GitHub repository paulrobello/parsidion (10 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 117 tokens to every session and 1,042 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
context-finder
Read-only, memory- and index-aware codebase search. Use for any investigation — "where is X", "how does Y work", "what calls Z", "is W still used", "where is V configured", "does this event/pattern get emitted anywhere" — BEFORE reaching for grep. Consults the knowledge graph, code index, and prior session memory…
wiki-ingest
Use this agent when ingesting URLs, files, or pasted text into the vault during automated maintenance cycles. Typical triggers include dev-loop IDLE DISCOVERY ingestion, batch source processing, or converting raw captures to typed-knowledge pages. See "When to invoke" in the agent body for worked scenarios.
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
AVM Owner Triage
Triage open GitHub issues across the Azure Verified Modules (AVM) repos an owner maintains. Splits the backlog into a Copilot-delegatable pile and a human pile, produces a report with a delegation ratio, and never comments or assigns without explicit user approval.
Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode
Agent "Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode" from github/awesome-copilot, covering quantum cognitive architecture, phase 2: adversarial intelligence & red-team analysis, phase 3: implementation & iterative refinement and phase 4: comprehensive verification & completion.