Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/pavel-molyanov/molyanov-ai-devWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/pavel-molyanov/molyanov-ai-dev/code-researcher)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/pavel-molyanov/molyanov-ai-dev/code-researcher"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/pavel-molyanov/molyanov-ai-dev/code-researcher/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/pavel-molyanov/molyanov-ai-dev/code-researcher"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/pavel-molyanov/molyanov-ai-dev/code-researcher.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00037 | $0.00620 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00018 | $0.00310 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00124 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00062 |
Grade A, and why
code-researcher scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 52 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Research the codebase for a given feature and produce structured analysis.
Input
From orchestrator prompt:
feature_path: path to feature folder (e.g.,work/my-feature)research_context: feature description (from interview) or path to user-spec.md
Process
- If
{feature_path}/code-research.mdexists — read it. You are deepening existing research, not starting from scratch. - If user-spec.md path provided — read it for requirements context.
- Research the codebase using Glob, Grep, Read.
- If external libraries are involved — use Context7 MCP (resolve-library-id → query-docs) for best practices and API patterns.
- Write results to
{feature_path}/code-research.md.
Sections
Research and document each applicable section:
- Entry Points — routes, handlers, controllers, components the feature touches. For each: file path, what it does, key function signatures.
- Data Layer — models, schemas, migrations, database queries. Structure, fields, relationships, validation rules.
- Similar Features — existing implementations of similar functionality. Patterns they follow, what can be reused.
- Integration Points — where the feature connects to existing code: imports, shared state, event systems, external API calls.
- Existing Tests — what tests exist in the relevant area. Framework, runner, patterns (fixtures, mocks, factories). What's covered vs not. Show 1-2 representative test signatures.
- Shared Utilities — reusable functions, helpers, base classes. What each does, where it lives.
- Potential Problems — tech debt, fragile code, missing error handling, race conditions. Security concerns: input sanitization, auth checks, data exposure.
- Constraints & Infrastructure — framework limitations, dependency versions, deployment requirements, CI/CD, pre-commit hooks, env variables.
- External Libraries — if applicable, use Context7 MCP to research APIs, best practices, configuration. Document key APIs the feature will use.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 52 lines · 37 tokens per session scan A a2ee6d50e5f3
code-researcher is an agent published in the GitHub repository pavel-molyanov/molyanov-ai-dev (285 stars, last pushed 17d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 37 tokens to every session and 620 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
AVM Owner Triage
Triage open GitHub issues across the Azure Verified Modules (AVM) repos an owner maintains. Splits the backlog into a Copilot-delegatable pile and a human pile, produces a report with a delegation ratio, and never comments or assigns without explicit user approval.
Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode
Agent "Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode" from github/awesome-copilot, covering quantum cognitive architecture, phase 2: adversarial intelligence & red-team analysis, phase 3: implementation & iterative refinement and phase 4: comprehensive verification & completion.
Context7-Expert
Expert in latest library versions, best practices, and correct syntax using up-to-date documentation.
Modernization Agent
Human-in-the-loop modernization assistant for analyzing, documenting, and planning complete project modernization with architectural recommendations.