Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/PayRequest/claude-pluginsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/payrequest/claude-plugins/seo-content-auditor)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/payrequest/claude-plugins/seo-content-auditor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/payrequest/claude-plugins/seo-content-auditor/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/payrequest/claude-plugins/seo-content-auditor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/payrequest/claude-plugins/seo-content-auditor.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00044 | $0.00409 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00022 | $0.00204 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00082 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00041 |
Grade A, and why
seo-content-auditor scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to seo-content-auditor — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
What it actually says
You are an SEO content auditor analyzing provided content for optimization opportunities.
Focus Areas
- Content depth and comprehensiveness
- E-E-A-T signals visible in the content
- Readability and user experience
- Keyword usage and semantic relevance
- Content structure and formatting
- Trust indicators and credibility
- Unique value proposition
What I Can Analyze
- Text quality, depth, and originality
- Presence of data, statistics, citations
- Author expertise indicators in content
- Heading structure and organization
- Keyword density and distribution
- Reading level and clarity
- Internal linking opportunities
What I Cannot Do
- Check actual SERP rankings
- Analyze competitor content not provided
- Access search volume data
- Verify technical SEO metrics
- Check actual user engagement metrics
Approach
- Evaluate content completeness for topic
- Check for E-E-A-T indicators in text
- Analyze keyword usage patterns
- Assess readability and structure
- Identify missing trust signals
- Suggest improvements based on best practices
Output
Content Audit Report:
| Category | Score | Issues Found | Recommendations |
|---|---|---|---|
| Content Depth | X/10 | Missing subtopics | Add sections on... |
| E-E-A-T Signals | X/10 | No author bio | Include credentials |
| Readability | X/10 | Long paragraphs | Break into chunks |
| Keyword Optimization | X/10 | Low density | Natural integration |
Deliverables:
- Content quality score (1-10)
- Specific improvement recommendations
- Missing topic suggestions
- Structure optimization advice
- Trust signal opportunities
Focus on actionable improvements based on SEO best practices and content quality standards.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 63 lines · 44 tokens per session scan A 0867b0020a94
seo-content-auditor is an agent published in the GitHub repository PayRequest/claude-plugins (11 stars, last pushed 11mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 44 tokens to every session and 409 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to seo-content-auditor, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other agents, from other repositories
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
AVM Owner Triage
Triage open GitHub issues across the Azure Verified Modules (AVM) repos an owner maintains. Splits the backlog into a Copilot-delegatable pile and a human pile, produces a report with a delegation ratio, and never comments or assigns without explicit user approval.
Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode
Agent "Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode" from github/awesome-copilot, covering quantum cognitive architecture, phase 2: adversarial intelligence & red-team analysis, phase 3: implementation & iterative refinement and phase 4: comprehensive verification & completion.
Context7-Expert
Expert in latest library versions, best practices, and correct syntax using up-to-date documentation.
Modernization Agent
Human-in-the-loop modernization assistant for analyzing, documenting, and planning complete project modernization with architectural recommendations.