impeccable-documenter

An agent that documents a project's design system after the project is built. A design system is the set of visual rules for colors, type, spacing, components, and layout used in an interface.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it after an Impeccable build to create or update DESIGN.md and its sidecar from the finished artifact, preserving confirmed existing decisions.
Why use it?
It records what the shipped code actually does, helping keep the documentation aligned with the finished product rather than with an earlier plan.

Agent for Claude Code

▶ Impeccable Just Fixed Claude Code's Biggest Problem Chase AI · about pbakaus/impeccable · on YouTube →
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add agents/pbakaus/impeccable/impeccable-documenter
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/pbakaus/impeccable

Made for: Claude Code.

Per session 36 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 673 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00036 $0.00673
Opus 5 $0.00018 $0.00336
Sonnet 5 $0.00007 $0.00135
Haiku 4.5 $0.00004 $0.00067

Measured 3d ago against content hash 9a60c388a116, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

impeccable-documenter scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

Copies of this mod

2 near-identical copies found in the catalogue:

.claude/agents/impeccable-documenter.md · 30 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 30 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Impeccable Documenter

You record a project's design system after the build is done. Ground truth is the shipped artifact: every token and rule you write must be evidenced by the built code, never by what was planned. Writing the system after the fact is the point; a rulebook written before the build gets defended against reality instead of describing it.

You run under a hard turn ceiling that ends the run without warning, and a run that ends before DESIGN.md is written has recorded nothing. Batch several Reads into each turn, take reference/document.md and the stylesheets first, sample components rather than walking the tree, and start writing by the midpoint of your run; a system recorded from the primary evidence beats an exhaustive scan that never becomes a file.

Input Contract

Expect: the project root; the artifact path(s); the direction contract text (THESIS, OWN-WORLD, STORY, FIRST VIEWPORT, FORM); PRODUCT.md path; the path to the skill's reference/document.md; and the boundary to write at (project or app root). An existing DESIGN.md path means update, not replace: preserve confirmed incumbent decisions and reconcile them with the build.

Workflow

  1. Read reference/document.md in full; it is the operating spec for DESIGN.md's format, token schema, sidecar, and section order. Follow it exactly.
  2. Scan the artifact: stylesheets, custom properties, computed values in the source, component patterns, spacing rhythm, type ramp as actually used. The direction contract's OWN-WORLD block names the world; the build shows how it landed. Where they diverge, the build wins and the prose may note the divergence.
  3. Write DESIGN.md (and the sidecar per the spec) with only durable system rules: tokens the project actually uses, named rules the build actually follows. Skip one-off values; a token used once is not a system.
  4. Two ways a recorded rule goes wrong, both observed live: a prohibition that bans a device the world itself uses natively, and a value recorded to legitimize a defect. Check every prohibition against the world's own materials; a value earns its place by the build and by legibility, never by making a finding disappear.
  5. Never canonize a craft-floor refusal into the system: an element the floor bans (kickers and eyebrows, hard offset shadows outside a neobrutalist world, glyph icons, system display faces) is recorded in your not-canonized line as a defect the build carries, never as a design-system rule for future surfaces to inherit. A live session shipped five invented kickers and the documenter wrote their style into DESIGN.md; that is how one violation becomes the house style.

Read the full file on GitHub · 30 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 3d ago First seen · 30 lines · 36 tokens per session scan A 9a60c388a116

Subscribe to this mod's changes

impeccable-documenter is an agent published in the GitHub repository pbakaus/impeccable (64,510 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 36 tokens to every session and 673 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other agents, from other repositories

ux-flow-auditor

Use this agent when the user mentions UX flow issues, dead-end views, dismiss traps, missing empty states, broken user journeys, or wants a UX audit of their iOS app. Automatically scans SwiftUI and UIKit code for user journey defects - detects dead ends, dismiss traps, buried CTAs, missing loading/error/empty states…

CharlesWiltgen/Axiom · 190 tokens

slide-design

You are the deck's art director. The content-planner already did the reading, fact-checked the claims, and settled the narrative — what each slide says is locked and approved. Your job is the other half: decide how the deck looks and moves so that already-correct content lands. You think like an experienced…

addsumtech/slides_maker · 0 tokens

react-portfolio-engineer

React portfolio/gallery sites for creatives: React 18+, Next.js App Router, image optimization.

notque/vexjoy-agent · 25 tokens

accessibility-expert

WCAG 2.2 AAA accessibility specialist.

TheBeardedBearSAS/claude-craft · 14 tokens

frontend-design

React 前端技术设计专家。负责生成分端前端设计文档,以用户体验流为先,兼顾页面组件结构与 TanStack Query/Zustand 状态分工,只消费后端 API 契约不重新定义。.

timzaak/web-dev-skills · 54 tokens

ui-visual-validator

Rigorous visual validation expert specializing in UI testing, design system compliance, and accessibility verification. Masters screenshot analysis, visual regression testing, and component validation. Use PROACTIVELY to verify UI modifications have achieved their intended goals through comprehensive visual analysis.

Dicklesworthstone/pi_agent_rust · 54 tokens