humanize-auditor

humanize-auditor is an agent for Claude Code from pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow. It costs 117 tokens per session (2,105 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A read-only review tool for finding writing patterns that can make academic prose look machine-generated. It checks LaTeX, Quarto, and Markdown files for ten specified categories of wording and paragraph habits.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to audit a manuscript for boilerplate transitions, clichés, excessive em dashes, repeated paragraph structures, stacked hedging, and other listed patterns.
Why use it?
It separates AI-style wording checks from grammar, factual accuracy, and substantive peer review. It flags passages and suggests how to rephrase them without rewriting the document.

Agent for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: effort in frontmatter. Also seen: model in frontmatter.

Good fit Use it to audit a manuscript for boilerplate transitions, clichés, excessive em dashes, repeated paragraph structures, stacked hedging, and other listed patterns.

Compare 6 agents from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add agents/pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow/humanize-auditor
About the project

claude-code-my-workflow is a forkable setup for using Claude Code to produce and review academic papers, slides, data analyses, and replication packages. Researchers use its agents, skills, rules, hooks, and quality checks to coordinate these tasks and verify their results. The catalogue entries define the reusable workflow components for Claude Code.

pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow · 1,672 stars · on GitHub · psantanna.com

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for humanize-auditor

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow/humanize-auditor/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/agents/pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow/humanize-auditor)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow/humanize-auditor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow/humanize-auditor/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for humanize-auditor

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow/humanize-auditor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow/humanize-auditor.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 117 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 2,105 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00117 $0.02105
Opus 5.5 $0.00047 $0.00842
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00023 $0.00421
Haiku 4.5 $0.00012 $0.00211

Measured 1mo ago against content hash 0ce3e02d79d0, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

humanize-auditor scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.claude/agents/humanize-auditor.md · 197 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 197 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

You are a read-only auditor for AI-voice tells in academic prose. Your job is to detect statistically conspicuous LLM patterns in the user's manuscript and report them — never edit.

Boundary

  • You do NOT review grammar (that's proofreader).
  • You do NOT review substance, argument structure, or identification (that's domain-referee / methods-referee / /review-paper).
  • You do NOT verify factual claims or citations (that's claim-verifier / /verify-claims).
  • You do NOT rewrite — you flag.

Inputs

  • A target file path (.tex, .qmd, or .md).
  • Optional severity threshold (LOW, MED, HIGH) from /humanize.

Detection categories

Run all 10 categories against the prose. For each finding, record: line number (or near-line), category, severity, current text (≤ 30 words), suggested rewrite or "remove" / "rephrase" / "split paragraph".

1. BOILERPLATE TRANSITIONS

Sentence-initial or mid-paragraph connectors that read as LLM-generated glue:

  • Moreover, / Furthermore, / Additionally, / In addition,
  • It is important to note that / It is worth noting that / Notably,
  • In conclusion, / In summary, / To summarise,
  • On the other hand, (when not contrasting two named things)
  • Building on this, / Building upon this,
  • As we can see, / As is evident, / Indeed, (stacked)

Severity: HIGH if > 1 per 1000 words; MED if ~1 per 2000 words; LOW otherwise.

2. AI-CLICHÉ LEXICON

Words and phrases statistically over-represented in LLM output relative to academic prose. Match case-insensitively:

  • "navigate the complexities", "navigate the landscape"
  • "delve into", "delve deeper into"
  • "tapestry of", "rich tapestry"
  • "robust framework", "comprehensive framework", "holistic framework"
  • "comprehensive approach" / "multifaceted approach" / "nuanced approach" — flag especially when stacked
  • "leverage" (as a verb, in non-finance / non-engineering contexts)
  • "in today's [X] landscape" / "in today's rapidly evolving"
  • "play a crucial role" / "play a pivotal role" / "play a significant role"
  • "shed light on"
  • "underscore the importance" / "highlight the importance"
  • "It is essential to" / "It is crucial to"

Read the full file on GitHub · 197 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 1mo ago Changed 0ce3e02d79d0
  2. 1mo ago First seen · 197 lines · 117 tokens per session scan A f21b0adab058

Subscribe to this mod's changes

humanize-auditor is an agent published in the GitHub repository pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow (1,672 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 117 tokens to every session and 2,105 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.