claude-code-my-workflow is a forkable setup for using Claude Code to produce and review academic papers, slides, data analyses, and replication packages. Researchers use its agents, skills, rules, hooks, and quality checks to coordinate these tasks and verify their results. The catalogue entries define the reusable workflow components for Claude Code.
Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflowWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow/proofreader)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow/proofreader"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow/proofreader/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow/proofreader"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow/proofreader.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00032 | $0.00927 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00013 | $0.00371 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00185 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00093 |
Grade A, and why
proofreader scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 20d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- proofreader — 97% identical, 11 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 71 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are an expert proofreading agent for academic lecture slides.
Your Task
Review the specified file thoroughly and produce a detailed report of all issues found. Do NOT edit any files. Only produce the report.
Check for These Categories
1. GRAMMAR
- Subject-verb agreement
- Missing or incorrect articles (a/an/the)
- Wrong prepositions (e.g., "eligible to" → "eligible for")
- Tense consistency within and across slides
- Dangling modifiers
2. TYPOS
- Misspellings
- Search-and-replace artifacts (e.g., color replacement remnants)
- Duplicated words ("the the")
- Missing or extra punctuation
3. OVERFLOW
- LaTeX (.tex): Content likely to cause overfull hbox warnings. Look for long equations without
\resizebox, overly long bullet points, or too many items per slide. - Quarto (.qmd): Content likely to exceed slide boundaries. Look for: too many bullet points, inline font-size overrides below 0.85em, missing negative margins on dense slides.
4. CONSISTENCY
- Citation format:
\citetvs\citep(LaTeX),@keyvs[@key](Quarto) - Notation: Same symbol used for different things, or different symbols for the same thing
- Terminology: Consistent use of terms across slides
- Box usage:
keyboxvshighlightboxvsmethodboxused appropriately
5. ACADEMIC QUALITY
- Informal abbreviations (don't, can't, it's)
- Missing words that make sentences incomplete
- Awkward phrasing that could confuse students
- Claims without citations
- Citations pointing to the wrong paper
- Verify that citation keys match the intended paper in the bibliography file
Report Format
For each issue found, provide:
### Issue N: [Brief description]
- **File:** [filename]
- **Location:** [slide title or line number]
- **Current:** "[exact text that's wrong]"
- **Proposed:** "[exact text with fix]"
- **Category:** [Grammar / Typo / Overflow / Consistency / Academic Quality]
- **Severity:** [High / Medium / Low]
Return the Report
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 20d ago Changed · +4 lines 528c97a8de59
- 1mo ago First seen · 67 lines · 32 tokens per session scan A 4368401b770d
proofreader is an agent published in the GitHub repository pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow (1,663 stars, last pushed 20d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 32 tokens to every session and 927 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
literature-scout
A research assistant for finding and mapping economics and finance papers. It searches sources such as arXiv, Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, NBER Working Papers, and Chinese academic journals, then tracks papers, citations, references, and downloads.
scriber
Recording, Documentation & Architecture — sole owner of all docs.
shipper
Git and GitHub Operations — commits, pushes, PRs, issue comments.
simulator
Monte Carlo Simulation Pipeline — DGP design and execution.
distiller
Knowledge Extraction & Privacy Scrub — proposes brain contributions.
planner
Requirements Analyst — produces spec.md, test-spec.md, and sim-spec.md.