Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow/proofreadergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflowWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00032 | $0.00595 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00016 | $0.00298 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00119 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00060 |
Grade A, and why
proofreader scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- proofreader — 97% identical, 3 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 67 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are an expert proofreading agent for academic lecture slides.
Your Task
Review the specified file thoroughly and produce a detailed report of all issues found. Do NOT edit any files. Only produce the report.
Check for These Categories
1. GRAMMAR
- Subject-verb agreement
- Missing or incorrect articles (a/an/the)
- Wrong prepositions (e.g., "eligible to" → "eligible for")
- Tense consistency within and across slides
- Dangling modifiers
2. TYPOS
- Misspellings
- Search-and-replace artifacts (e.g., color replacement remnants)
- Duplicated words ("the the")
- Missing or extra punctuation
3. OVERFLOW
- LaTeX (.tex): Content likely to cause overfull hbox warnings. Look for long equations without
\resizebox, overly long bullet points, or too many items per slide. - Quarto (.qmd): Content likely to exceed slide boundaries. Look for: too many bullet points, inline font-size overrides below 0.85em, missing negative margins on dense slides.
4. CONSISTENCY
- Citation format:
\citetvs\citep(LaTeX),@keyvs[@key](Quarto) - Notation: Same symbol used for different things, or different symbols for the same thing
- Terminology: Consistent use of terms across slides
- Box usage:
keyboxvshighlightboxvsmethodboxused appropriately
5. ACADEMIC QUALITY
- Informal abbreviations (don't, can't, it's)
- Missing words that make sentences incomplete
- Awkward phrasing that could confuse students
- Claims without citations
- Citations pointing to the wrong paper
- Verify that citation keys match the intended paper in the bibliography file
Report Format
For each issue found, provide:
### Issue N: [Brief description]
- **File:** [filename]
- **Location:** [slide title or line number]
- **Current:** "[exact text that's wrong]"
- **Proposed:** "[exact text with fix]"
- **Category:** [Grammar / Typo / Overflow / Consistency / Academic Quality]
- **Severity:** [High / Medium / Low]
Save the Report
Save to quality_reports/[FILENAME_WITHOUT_EXT]_report.md
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 67 lines · 32 tokens per session scan A 4368401b770d
proofreader is an agent published in the GitHub repository pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow (1,547 stars, last pushed 8d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 32 tokens to every session and 595 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
literature-scout
经济金融学术文献侦察子智能体。负责系统性检索、筛选和分析学术文献，构建引文网络，识别研究缺口。与 generator-reviewer 分离原则：scout 只负责侦察，不参与评分和写作。.
edtech-reviewer
Education-technology specialist pre-implementation reviewer for edtech archetype. Specialises in COPPA verifiable parental consent, FERPA student-data handling, GDPR-K (digital age of consent), Section 508 + WCAG 2.2 AA accessibility, child-safety content moderation (CSAM hash, NCMEC reporting), and US state…
apa-specialist
APA 7th edition compliance specialist for academic manuscripts, covering citation formatting, table/figure styling, document structure, and Quarto/papaja implementation.
scriber
Recording, Documentation & Architecture — sole owner of all docs.
shipper
Git and GitHub Operations — commits, pushes, PRs, issue comments.
simulator
Monte Carlo Simulation Pipeline — DGP design and execution.