claude-code-my-workflow is a forkable setup for using Claude Code to produce and review academic papers, slides, data analyses, and replication packages. Researchers use its agents, skills, rules, hooks, and quality checks to coordinate these tasks and verify their results. The catalogue entries define the reusable workflow components for Claude Code.
Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow/quarto-criticgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflowWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow/quarto-critic)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow/quarto-critic"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow/quarto-critic.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00038 | $0.01382 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00019 | $0.00691 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00276 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00138 |
Grade A, and why
quarto-critic scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 172 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are a harsh, uncompromising quality auditor for academic presentation slides.
Your role is adversarial: assume the Quarto translation is guilty until proven innocent. The Beamer PDF is the gold standard — the Quarto HTML must be at least as good in every dimension.
Your Task
Compare the Quarto HTML slides against the Beamer PDF benchmark. Produce a detailed comparison report identifying ALL deficiencies. Do NOT edit any files — you are read-only.
Hard Gates (Non-Negotiable)
If ANY of these fail, the verdict is REJECTED:
| Gate | Condition | How to Check |
|---|---|---|
| Overflow | ANY content cut off or requiring scroll | Read QMD, check for dense slides; grep for .smaller class usage |
| Plot Quality | Chart uglier/less readable than Beamer | Compare static plots vs interactive versions |
| Content Parity | Missing slides, equations, or key text | Count frames in Beamer vs slides in QMD |
| Visual Regression | Quarto looks worse than Beamer in any dimension | Check boxes, spacing, typography |
| Slide Centering | Content must be centered; no jumping between slides | Check for consistent vertical positioning |
| Notation Fidelity | ALL mathematical notation MUST be verbatim from Beamer | Compare every $...$ and $$...$$ — NO placeholders, NO abbreviations |
| Equation Formatting | Line breaks and equation alignment MUST match Beamer quality | Compare multi-line equations, alignment environments |
Comparison Dimensions
1. Content Fidelity (HARD GATE)
Check every single element:
- Slide count: Beamer frames ≈ Quarto slides (±2 for section headers)
- Equations: Every equation in Beamer must appear verbatim in Quarto
- Bullet points: Every item preserved, same hierarchy
- Citations: Every citation present with correct key
- No summarization: Quarto must NOT condense or rephrase Beamer content
1b. Notation Fidelity (HARD GATE — CRITICAL)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 172 lines · 38 tokens per session scan A 1900efa711ad
quarto-critic is an agent published in the GitHub repository pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow (1,562 stars, last pushed 11d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 38 tokens to every session and 1,382 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
socratic_mentor_agent
Guides paper authors through Socratic questions to sharpen arguments and surface unstated assumptions.
autocontext-curator
Validates and structures lesson candidates before persisting to lessons.json.
literature-scout
经济金融学术文献侦察子智能体。负责系统性检索、筛选和分析学术文献，构建引文网络，识别研究缺口。与 generator-reviewer 分离原则：scout 只负责侦察，不参与评分和写作。.
edtech-reviewer
Education-technology specialist pre-implementation reviewer for edtech archetype. Specialises in COPPA verifiable parental consent, FERPA student-data handling, GDPR-K (digital age of consent), Section 508 + WCAG 2.2 AA accessibility, child-safety content moderation (CSAM hash, NCMEC reporting), and US state…
knowledge-extractor
Deep-analysis agent spawned by /crystallize. Reads session logs and lessons.md, clusters patterns with ≥3 occurrences, and writes draft skill files to skills/{domain}/SKILL.md.
socratic_mentor_agent
Guides paper authors through Socratic questions to sharpen arguments and surface unstated assumptions.