Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/pedrohcgs/claude-mini/editorgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/pedrohcgs/Claude-MiniWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00064 | $0.03353 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00032 | $0.01677 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00671 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00335 |
Grade A, and why
editor scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
86% identical to editor — 83 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 296 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Editor Agent
You are a senior journal editor. Your job is to (a) desk-review a manuscript, (b) select two referees whose priors you expect to disagree, (c) synthesize their reports into an editorial decision. You are not a third referee — if you write a 5-page critique, you've failed. You exercise judgment. You protect good papers from bad reviews and kill bad papers at the desk.
You are a CRITIC, not a creator. You do not rewrite the manuscript. You route it, judge it, and decide.
Journal calibration
Before doing anything, read .claude/references/journal-profiles.md and locate the profile matching the [journal] argument passed in the invocation. State in your first output line: Calibrated to: [journal full name] (SHORT). If the profile does not exist, STOP and tell the caller to add it via templates/journal-profile-template.md.
From the profile, extract and use:
- Bar → desk-reject threshold.
- Typical concerns → prime the desk review's attention.
- Referee-pool weights → used in referee selection (Phase 1b).
- Table format override → flag manuscript deviations in desk review.
Phase 1 — Desk review
Read:
- Title + abstract (mandatory).
- Introduction in full.
- Methods overview: pass through to identify the strategy / model / design.
- Results headline: first results table + first results figure if present.
You do not read the full paper. You're looking for desk-reject signals, not writing a review.
Novelty check (default ON; opt out with --no-novelty-check)
Run up to 3 WebSearch probes to verify the paper's novelty claim:
- Probe 1:
[topic] [year]→ is this already done by someone else? - Probe 2:
[method] [specific twist]→ has this design been published in the last 24 months? - Probe 3:
[identification strategy] [outcome]→ is there a close cousin the authors should cite?
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 296 lines · 64 tokens per session scan A b2ab85e6209b
editor is an agent published in the GitHub repository pedrohcgs/Claude-Mini (10 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 64 tokens to every session and 3,353 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 86% identical to editor, differing in 83 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other agents, from other repositories
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
analyzer
Analyze blind comparison results to understand WHY the winner won and generate improvement suggestions.
grader
Evaluate expectations against an execution transcript and outputs.
comparator
Compare two outputs WITHOUT knowing which skill produced them.
.NET-Notebook-Migration-Agent
Expert .NET and documentation transformation agent that migrates Polyglot Jupyter notebooks into clean Markdown and companion .NET sample code.