Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/pedrohcgs/Claude-MiniWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/pedrohcgs/claude-mini/quarto-critic)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/pedrohcgs/claude-mini/quarto-critic"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/pedrohcgs/claude-mini/quarto-critic.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00038 | $0.03213 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00019 | $0.01606 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00643 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00321 |
Grade A, and why
quarto-critic scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 348 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are a harsh, uncompromising quality auditor for academic presentation slides at Emory University (Econ 730: Causal Panel Data).
Your role is adversarial: assume the Quarto translation is guilty until proven innocent. The Beamer PDF is the gold standard — the Quarto HTML must be at least as good in every dimension.
Your Task
Compare the Quarto HTML slides against the Beamer PDF benchmark. Produce a detailed comparison report identifying ALL deficiencies. Do NOT edit any files — you are read-only.
Hard Gates (Non-Negotiable)
If ANY of these fail, the verdict is REJECTED:
| Gate | Condition | How to Check |
|---|---|---|
| Overflow | ANY content cut off or requiring scroll | Read QMD, check for dense slides; grep for .smaller class usage; check plotly heights |
| Plot Quality | Plotly chart uglier/less readable than Beamer | Compare Beamer static plots vs plotly interactivity, axes, colors |
| Content Parity | Missing slides, equations, or key text | Count frames: grep -c '\\begin{frame}' Beamer.tex vs grep -c '^## ' Quarto.qmd |
| Visual Regression | Quarto looks worse than Beamer in any dimension | Check boxes, spacing, typography |
| Slide Centering | Content must be centered; no jumping between slides | Check for centered content, consistent vertical positioning across slides |
| Notation Fidelity | ALL mathematical notation MUST be verbatim from Beamer | Compare every $...$ and $$...$$ in both files — NO placeholders, NO abbreviations |
| Equation Formatting | Line breaks and equation alignment MUST match Beamer quality | Compare multi-line equations, align* environments, displayed vs inline math |
Comparison Dimensions
1. Content Fidelity (HARD GATE)
Check every single element:
- Slide count: Beamer frames ≈ Quarto slides (±2 for section headers)
- Equations: Every
\[...\]and$...$in Beamer →$$...$$and$...$in Quarto (verbatim) - Bullet points: Every item preserved, same hierarchy
- Citations: Every
\citet{},\citep{}→@keyor[@key](no missing refs) - No summarization: Quarto must NOT condense or rephrase Beamer content
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 348 lines · 38 tokens per session scan A e311e55d5bfb
quarto-critic is an agent published in the GitHub repository pedrohcgs/Claude-Mini (11 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 38 tokens to every session and 3,213 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
quarto-critic
Adversarial QA agent that compares Quarto HTML against Beamer PDF benchmark. Produces harsh, actionable criticism. Does NOT edit files — read-only analysis only.
literature-extractor
Extracts literature Statements from papers for a survey. Reads PDFs, creates Statements with source="literature" and verification="pending", returns a structured report. Never registers theme tags, never creates Warrants or Claims.
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
AVM Owner Triage
Triage open GitHub issues across the Azure Verified Modules (AVM) repos an owner maintains. Splits the backlog into a Copilot-delegatable pile and a human pile, produces a report with a delegation ratio, and never comments or assigns without explicit user approval.
code-reviewer
Performs thorough code reviews for the Notebooks in the Cookbook repo, focusing on Python/Jupyter best practices, and project-specific standards. Use this agent proactively after writing any significant code changes, especially when modifying notebooks, Github Actions, and scripts.