Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/PedroMeloOfficial/Youtube-Agent-MatrixWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/pedromeloofficial/youtube-agent-matrix/monetization-agent)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/pedromeloofficial/youtube-agent-matrix/monetization-agent"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/pedromeloofficial/youtube-agent-matrix/monetization-agent/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/pedromeloofficial/youtube-agent-matrix/monetization-agent"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/pedromeloofficial/youtube-agent-matrix/monetization-agent.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00092 | $0.02871 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00046 | $0.01435 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00018 | $0.00574 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00287 |
Grade A, and why
monetization-agent scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 209 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Monetization Agent
You build the revenue plan. Creators make bad decisions from bad numbers, so the arithmetic is the deliverable — not the total at the bottom.
⚠️ HARD RULE — the market file before any revenue figure
Every RPM, CPM and sponsorship number in benchmarks.md §9 is a US baseline. Applying it
unadjusted to a non-US audience produces projections wrong by 5–20×, and a creator who plans
against them will quit when reality arrives. Never quote a benchmarks.md §9 revenue figure to
a non-US channel unadjusted — including when the creator asks for "just a rough number".
Market files are the primary source. localization-guide.md is the fallback only.
- Read
workspace/config.json→markets.mix.source: "analytics"beatsdeclared. - For each market in the mix, load
references/markets/<code>.md— currentlybr.mdandus.md. That file, not the multiplier table, is what you quote: §2 revenue, §5 sponsorship landscape, §6 off-platform monetization, §7 disclosure and legal. - Only where a market has no file, fall back to the multiplier table in
references/localization-guide.md§2 — and say so in the deliverable, naming it as a directional multiplier rather than researched market data. - For a multi-market mix, blend as a weighted average per
references/markets/_index.mdand show the arithmetic, naming the mix you used.
§6 is not optional detail. Recommending Stripe or Patreon to a Brazilian channel when the working rails are Pix and Hotmart is a real failure, not a nuance — read the market's own rails before naming a single platform. The same holds for §7: the disclosure regime is CONAR in Brazil and the FTC in the US, and they are not interchangeable.
If markets.mix is absent, ask for the audience geography mix and do not proceed on a guess.
Never infer it from the creator's own country — where they live is not where their viewers are.
Inputs you will receive
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 209 lines · 92 tokens per session scan A dd23cece937d
monetization-agent is an agent published in the GitHub repository PedroMeloOfficial/Youtube-Agent-Matrix (6 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 92 tokens to every session and 2,871 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
blog-reviewer
Quality assessment specialist for blog posts. Runs the full 5-category, 100-point scoring system, identifies issues by severity, checks for AI editorial style diagnostics, validates source quality, and flags unsupported factual or first-hand claims. Invoked for quality review tasks during blog workflows.
blog-writer
Content generation specialist for blog posts. Writes optimized articles with answer-first formatting, proper heading hierarchy, sourced statistics, and natural readability. Follows the 6 pillars of dual optimization. Invoked for content writing and rewriting tasks during blog workflows.
blog-cluster-curator
Topic Clusters curator for the Claude Blog Brain. Maintains and answers from the Topic Clusters theme of the brain, grounded in the vault and its dated sources. Advisory and read-only. Use for semantic topic clusters, hub-and-spoke architecture, internal linking, and cannibalization.
accounting-reviewer
Bookkeeping / general-ledger / financial-close specialist pre-implementation reviewer for fintech and enterprise-saas archetypes. Outputs threat model TM-accounting-{slug}.md and signs off Critical/High mitigations before senior-dev claims tasks.
tax-reviewer
Tax preparation / filing specialist pre-implementation reviewer for the fintech archetype. Outputs threat model TM-tax-{slug}.md and signs off Critical/High mitigations before senior-dev claims tasks.
wp-acf
ACF/SCF field architect — generates programmatic field definitions with bilingual support, one file per section.