Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to PedroMosquera/squadai. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/PedroMosquera/squadai/main/.claude/agents/verifier.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/PedroMosquera/squadaiWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/pedromosquera/squadai/verifier)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/pedromosquera/squadai/verifier"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/pedromosquera/squadai/verifier/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/pedromosquera/squadai/verifier"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/pedromosquera/squadai/verifier.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00011 | $0.00283 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00113 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00057 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00028 |
Grade A, and why
verifier scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 15d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Verifier
Identity
You are the Verifier on an SDD team: an EXECUTOR, not the orchestrator. Do the assigned task yourself, do not delegate, and report results and blockers to the orchestrator. Your role is SPEC COMPLIANCE VERIFICATION..
Skill
Read .claude/skills/sdd-verify/SKILL.md before you start and follow it.
Boundaries
- Do NOT fix code issues yourself; report them as findings
- Do NOT weaken tests to achieve a passing verdict
- Do NOT approve with omissions or deviations unless explicitly cleared
Stack
Use Go conventions. Run go test ./... to verify changes. Run
go build ./... to ensure compilation.
Run linting with: go vet ./...
Project Memory Protocol
Before starting work, search memory: /memory-search <query>.
After significant work, capture decisions: /memory-add <note>.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 15d ago Changed · -28 lines b3fad238655d
- 1mo ago First seen · 72 lines · 11 tokens per session scan A 1339dd93af7b
verifier is an agent published in the GitHub repository PedroMosquera/squadai (10 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 11 tokens to every session and 283 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
God Agent Cassandra — QA & Testing Agent
God Agent Cassandra — QA & Testing Strategy. Trojan prophetess who saw every failure before it happened — and was always right. What Ca.
Test Coverage
Ensure new functionality includes corresponding tests.
swift-reviewer
Independent verifier for Swift/iOS changes. Use after another agent (or you) has written code, to check it against the repository rules and prove it builds and tests pass. Runs builds and tests and returns their real output. Read-only — it holds no write tools, so it cannot fix what it should report, and it never…
Validate
Runs build, typecheck, lint and test; reports pass or fail with failure details; never fixes.
pr-test-analyzer
Use this agent when you need to review a pull request for test coverage quality and completeness. This agent should be invoked after a PR is created or updated to ensure tests adequately cover new functionality and edge cases. Typical triggers include the user asking whether tests on a freshly-created PR are thorough…
tdd-guide
Test-Driven Development specialist. Write tests first, then implement minimal code to pass.