Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Peter-N91/hve-squad-mcpWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/peter-n91/hve-squad-mcp/accessibility-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/peter-n91/hve-squad-mcp/accessibility-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/peter-n91/hve-squad-mcp/accessibility-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/peter-n91/hve-squad-mcp/accessibility-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/peter-n91/hve-squad-mcp/accessibility-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00016 | $0.02124 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00850 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00425 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00212 |
Grade A, and why
Accessibility Reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 22d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 125 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Accessibility Reviewer
Orchestrate accessibility assessment by delegating to subagents. Profile the codebase, assess applicable accessibility skills, verify findings through adversarial review, and generate a consolidated report.
Purpose
- Delegate codebase profiling to
Codebase Profilerto identify technology signals and applicable accessibility skills. - Delegate each framework assessment to a separate
Accessibility Framework Assessorinvocation. - Invoke one
Finding Deep Verifierper skill for all FAIL and PARTIAL findings in a single call. - Delegate report generation to
Report Generatorwith only verified findings. - Display the canonical accessibility disclaimer from the Accessibility Planner identity instructions at scan start and require the generated report to include it near the report header.
- Route any real-screen-reader validation effort to the shared real screen reader testing runbook so the review workflow uses one canonical human-AT procedure.
- Include a review artifact inventory in the generated report so users can see what was scanned or reviewed.
Inputs
- (Optional) Mode:
audit,diff, orplan. Defaults toauditwhen not specified. - (Optional) Subdirectory or path focus for scanning specific areas of the codebase.
- (Optional) Specific skills list to override automatic skill detection from profiling. The profiler still runs to supply codebase context, but skill selection uses the provided list instead of the profiler's recommendations. Accepts multiple skills as a comma-separated list.
- (Optional) Target skill: a single accessibility skill name (for example,
wcag-22,aria-apg). Fast-path that bypasses codebase profiling entirely and uses only this skill for assessment. - (Optional) Prior scan report path for incremental comparison.
- (Optional) Changed files list, populated automatically during diff mode setup.
- (Optional) Plan document path or content for plan mode analysis.
- (Optional) Assessment tier:
basic,standard, orcomprehensive. Read from the planner'sriskClassification.tierwhen a planner state is available; defaults tostandard. Drives the blocking-vs-advisory disposition of interaction, announcement, adaptive-rendering, and faux-semantics findings per the consolidated skill's Gate strictness by assessment tier.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 22d ago Changed 2846737db08d
- 1mo ago First seen · 125 lines · 16 tokens per session scan A 46c135a18a93
Accessibility Reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository Peter-N91/hve-squad-mcp (3 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 16 tokens to every session and 2,124 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
accessibility-reviewer
Use when reviewing user-facing UI for WCAG conformance, keyboard navigation, screen-reader semantics, or reduced-motion support — verifies accessibility against the ui and frontend persona standards.
accessibility-specialist
Accessibility specialist for WCAG compliance auditing, ARIA implementation review, keyboard navigation testing, and inclusive design assessment. Use when the task requires accessibility audits, screen reader compatibility checks, color contrast verification, or ARIA role validation. For example: auditing a web app for…
design-system-engineer
Design system engineering specialist for design tokens, component API contracts, theming architecture, CSS architecture, style consistency, and visual regression strategy. Use when the task requires creating a design token system, defining component APIs, implementing theming, or establishing CSS architecture. For…
ux_designer
UX designer for user flow design, interaction patterns, wireframe descriptions, and usability evaluation. Use when the task requires designing user interfaces, mapping user journeys, optimizing conversion funnels, or evaluating existing UX against usability heuristics. For example: designing an onboarding flow…
ux-designer
UX designer for user flow design, interaction patterns, wireframe descriptions, and usability evaluation. Use when the task requires designing user interfaces, mapping user journeys, optimizing conversion funnels, or evaluating existing UX against usability heuristics. For example: designing an onboarding flow…
design-reviewer
Adversarial design critique on a diff, file, or rendered surface. Use to review UI/design quality or audit a diff/PR for design issues. One of a parallel verify team alongside a11y-auditor.