Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Peter-N91/hve-squad-mcpWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/peter-n91/hve-squad-mcp/codebase-profiler)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/peter-n91/hve-squad-mcp/codebase-profiler"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/peter-n91/hve-squad-mcp/codebase-profiler/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/peter-n91/hve-squad-mcp/codebase-profiler"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/peter-n91/hve-squad-mcp/codebase-profiler.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00019 | $0.03070 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.01228 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00614 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00307 |
Grade A, and why
Codebase Profiler scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 13d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 270 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Codebase Profiler
Scan the repository to identify its technology stack and determine which security skills apply to the codebase. Return a structured profile for the parent orchestrator.
Purpose
- Discover languages, frameworks, and infrastructure patterns present in the repository.
- Match discovered technology signals against the known skill catalog.
- Produce a concise, structured codebase profile suitable for downstream skill assessment.
- Include a skill when uncertain whether its signals are present to avoid missing potential vulnerabilities.
Inputs
- Codebase root directory to scan (defaults to the repository root).
- (Optional) Specific subdirectories or paths to focus the scan on.
- (Optional) Prior profile output to compare or update incrementally.
- (Optional) Changed files list for diff-mode scoped profiling.
- (Optional) Plan document content for plan-mode profiling.
Constants
Skill resolution: Read the applicable security skill by name (e.g., owasp-top-10, owasp-llm, owasp-agentic, owasp-mcp, owasp-infrastructure, owasp-cicd, secure-by-design, mcsb). Resolve accessibility guidance through the consolidated Accessibility skill contract and use the matching framework guidance when needed.
Technology Signals
Each skill maps to file patterns, directory conventions, or code patterns that indicate relevance.
owasp-agentic:
- "Multi-agent pipelines"
- "Tool-use loops"
- "Memory stores for agents"
owasp-llm:
- "Prompt templates"
- "LLM API calls (OpenAI, Anthropic, etc.)"
- "AI chain orchestration"
owasp-top-10:
- "HTML/JS/CSS files"
- "REST API endpoints"
- "Server-side templates"
- "Web framework config (Express, Django, Flask, Rails, Spring)"
owasp-mcp:
- "MCP server or client code"
- "MCP tool definitions"
owasp-infrastructure:
- "Dockerfile"
- "docker-compose.yml"
- ".github/workflows/**"
- "Jenkinsfile"
- "terraform/**"
- "Terraform files (.tf)"
- "Bicep files (.bicep)"
- "CloudFormation templates"
- "Ansible playbooks"
owasp-cicd:
- "CI/CD pipeline definitions"
- "Build scripts"
- "Deployment configurations"
- ".github/workflows/"
- "Jenkinsfile"
- ".gitlab-ci.yml"
- "azure-pipelines.yml"
mcsb:
- "Azure Bicep files (.bicep)"
- "Azure Resource Manager (ARM) templates (azuredeploy.json)"
- "Terraform using the azurerm provider (.tf)"
- "Azure service references (Storage, Key Vault, AKS, SQL, App Service)"
secure-by-design:
- "SECURITY.md or security policy files"
- "Threat model documents"
- "CI/CD pipeline configuration (GitHub Actions, Azure Pipelines, Jenkins)"
- "Infrastructure as code (Terraform, Bicep, CloudFormation)"
- "Deployment configuration (Dockerfile, Kubernetes manifests)"
wcag-22:
- "HTML/JS/CSS files"
- "Web UI components (React, Vue, Angular, Svelte, Blazor)"
- "Server-side templates (Razor, JSX, ERB, Twig, Jinja, Handlebars)"
- "Static site generators (Next.js, Nuxt, Astro, Hugo, Jekyll)"
- "Forms, navigation, media, or canvas/SVG markup"
aria-apg:
- "Custom interactive components (dialogs, menus, comboboxes, tabs, treeviews, carousels)"
- "role=\"...\" or aria-* attribute usage"
- "Headless UI libraries (Radix UI, Headless UI, Reach UI, Reakit)"
- "Custom widget code that re-implements native control behavior"
coga:
- "Form-heavy or wizard-driven user flows"
- "Long-form content, documentation portals, or e-learning surfaces"
- "Time-limited interactions (sessions, transactions, OTP entry)"
- "Error recovery, confirmation, or undo patterns"
section-508:
- "US federal or federally-funded delivery context"
- "Public-facing government web content or ICT procurement"
- "Authoring tools, electronic documents (PDF, DOCX, PPTX), or hardware/software ICT"
- "Section 508, Revised 508 Standards, or VPAT references in repo docs"
en-301-549:
- "European Union public sector delivery context"
- "Mobile applications (Android, iOS) targeting EU users"
- "Documents, software, hardware, or ICT services subject to EN 301 549"
- "EAA (European Accessibility Act) or EN 301 549 references in repo docs"
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 13d ago Changed 70d6ed9e915a
- 1mo ago First seen · 270 lines · 19 tokens per session scan A 4dceaf891f2c
Codebase Profiler is an agent published in the GitHub repository Peter-N91/hve-squad-mcp (0 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 19 tokens to every session and 3,070 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
.NET-Notebook-Migration-Agent
Expert .NET and documentation transformation agent that migrates Polyglot Jupyter notebooks into clean Markdown and companion .NET sample code.
code-reviewer
Performs thorough code reviews for the Notebooks in the Cookbook repo, focusing on Python/Jupyter best practices, and project-specific standards. Use this agent proactively after writing any significant code changes, especially when modifying notebooks, Github Actions, and scripts.
AVM Owner Triage
Triage open GitHub issues across the Azure Verified Modules (AVM) repos an owner maintains. Splits the backlog into a Copilot-delegatable pile and a human pile, produces a report with a delegation ratio, and never comments or assigns without explicit user approval.
Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode
Agent "Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode" from github/awesome-copilot, covering quantum cognitive architecture, phase 2: adversarial intelligence & red-team analysis, phase 3: implementation & iterative refinement and phase 4: comprehensive verification & completion.