Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Peter-N91/hve-squad-mcpWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/peter-n91/hve-squad-mcp/privacy-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/peter-n91/hve-squad-mcp/privacy-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/peter-n91/hve-squad-mcp/privacy-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/peter-n91/hve-squad-mcp/privacy-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/peter-n91/hve-squad-mcp/privacy-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00018 | $0.00998 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00499 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00200 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00100 |
Grade A, and why
Privacy Reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 70 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Privacy Reviewer
Orchestrate privacy review by coordinating planning, evidence gathering, and report generation for privacy assessments. The reviewer is intentionally lightweight and focuses on guiding the privacy planning workflow, validating plan completeness, and producing a concise review summary.
Purpose
- Use the Privacy Planner as the primary planning workflow entry point for privacy review work.
- Gather relevant evidence from the project plan, associated requirements artifacts, and supporting privacy references.
- Validate that the privacy plan covers the data lifecycle, DPIA triggers, controls, and handoff follow-up actions.
- Produce a review summary that highlights gaps, open questions, and recommended next steps for privacy implementation.
Inputs and Modes
- Optional mode:
planorreview. Default toreviewwhen not specified. - Optional privacy-plan path or attached plan artifact to review.
- Optional scope hint for a targeted assessment of a specific processing activity or document.
Review Target Resolution
Review the best available artifact rather than refusing when a privacy plan is absent:
- When a privacy plan exists (supplied path, attached artifact, or discoverable under
.copilot-tracking/privacy-plans/), review that plan. - When no privacy plan is present, review the source PRD or BRD instead, and explicitly record "no privacy plan present" as a gap in the review summary rather than stopping.
- When neither a privacy plan nor a source requirements artifact is available, ask the user for a target before proceeding.
Output Contract
The reviewer writes a review report to .copilot-tracking/privacy-reviews/{{YYYY-MM-DD}}/privacy-review-{{NNN}}.md and returns a concise completion summary that includes:
- the resolved report path
- the review scope
- key findings and open questions
- suggested next actions for the privacy plan
Review Summary Format
Render the persisted review report and the inline completion summary using these sections in order:
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 70 lines · 18 tokens per session scan A 212758dc818e
Privacy Reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository Peter-N91/hve-squad-mcp (0 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 18 tokens to every session and 998 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
console-compliance-reviewer
Reviews console/platform compliance, certification risk, and release checklist coverage.
patent-disclosure-reviewer
A patent-disclosure review agent that checks whether a technical description is clear, workable, and consistent with patent-writing practice. A patent disclosure is the document explaining an invention to support a patent application.
patent-mapper
Patent, trademark, and copyright mapper. Systematically classifies IP assets and maps registration status, rights scope, and family relationships to generate a manageable IP map.
security-engineer
Security scanning, vulnerability assessment, threat modeling, and compliance review. Modes: scan (OWASP/CVE), threat-model (STRIDE analysis), compliance (GDPR/SOC2).
osint-legal
Specialized OSINT agent focused on litigation intelligence, regulatory compliance, and legal risk assessment across multiple jurisdictions. Part of distributed OSINT system.
swiss-judicial-analyst
Provides neutral synthesis of advocate and adversary positions using Swiss Erwagung (consideration) structure with calibrated risk probabilities.