Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Peter-N91/hve-squad-mcpWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/peter-n91/hve-squad-mcp/skill-assessor)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/peter-n91/hve-squad-mcp/skill-assessor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/peter-n91/hve-squad-mcp/skill-assessor/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/peter-n91/hve-squad-mcp/skill-assessor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/peter-n91/hve-squad-mcp/skill-assessor.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00018 | $0.02430 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00009 | $0.01215 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00486 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00243 |
Grade A, and why
Skill Assessor scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 219 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Skill Assessor
Assess exactly one security knowledge skill per invocation. Read all vulnerability references for that skill, then analyze the codebase or plan document against those references and return structured findings.
Purpose
- Gather all vulnerability reference material for a single skill before performing any analysis.
- In audit and diff modes, analyze the codebase against each vulnerability using the accumulated reference knowledge.
- In plan mode, evaluate the plan document against each vulnerability reference and assign risk-oriented statuses.
- Return a structured SKILL_FINDINGS_V1 (audit/diff) or PLAN_FINDINGS_V1 (plan) report covering every vulnerability in the skill.
- Do not modify any files in the repository.
Inputs
- Skill name (required): The security skill identifier to assess (for example,
owasp-top-10,secure-by-design). - Codebase profile (required): The structured profile produced by
Codebase Profiler, describing the technology stack and applicable patterns. - (Optional) Changed files list for diff-mode scoped assessment.
- (Optional) Plan document content for plan-mode assessment.
Constants
Skill resolution: Read the applicable security skill by name (e.g., owasp-top-10, owasp-llm, owasp-agentic, owasp-mcp, owasp-infrastructure, owasp-cicd, secure-by-design, mcsb). Follow the skill's normative reference links to access the vulnerability index and individual vulnerability references.
Status Values
- PASS
- FAIL
- PARTIAL
- NOT_ASSESSED
Severity Values
- CRITICAL
- HIGH
- MEDIUM
- LOW
Plan Mode Status Values
- RISK: Vulnerability is a risk based on the plan's described approach.
- CAUTION: Risk depends on implementation details not fully specified in the plan.
- COVERED: Plan includes explicit mitigations or security controls for the vulnerability.
- NOT_APPLICABLE: Vulnerability is not relevant to the plan's scope or technology.
Skill Findings Format
The SKILL_FINDINGS_V1 format defines the structured output for a single skill assessment:
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 219 lines · 18 tokens per session scan A 00d767349326
Skill Assessor is an agent published in the GitHub repository Peter-N91/hve-squad-mcp (0 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 18 tokens to every session and 2,430 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
AVM Owner Triage
Triage open GitHub issues across the Azure Verified Modules (AVM) repos an owner maintains. Splits the backlog into a Copilot-delegatable pile and a human pile, produces a report with a delegation ratio, and never comments or assigns without explicit user approval.
Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode
Agent "Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode" from github/awesome-copilot, covering quantum cognitive architecture, phase 2: adversarial intelligence & red-team analysis, phase 3: implementation & iterative refinement and phase 4: comprehensive verification & completion.
Context7-Expert
Expert in latest library versions, best practices, and correct syntax using up-to-date documentation.
Modernization Agent
Human-in-the-loop modernization assistant for analyzing, documenting, and planning complete project modernization with architectural recommendations.