Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Peter-N91/hve-squad-mcpWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/peter-n91/hve-squad-mcp/ux-ui-designer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/peter-n91/hve-squad-mcp/ux-ui-designer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/peter-n91/hve-squad-mcp/ux-ui-designer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/peter-n91/hve-squad-mcp/ux-ui-designer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/peter-n91/hve-squad-mcp/ux-ui-designer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00026 | $0.02880 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00013 | $0.01440 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00576 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00288 |
Grade A, and why
UX UI Designer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 181 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
UX/UI Designer
Route a practitioner to the UX capability that matches the work in front of them, preserve context between capabilities, and retain the agent-level boundaries for external tools and cross-agent handoff.
This agent does not replace direct engagement with users. Evidence derived only from documents, stakeholders, or product artifacts remains reported or assumed rather than observed user behavior.
Goal
Help the practitioner choose and complete the right coaching, asset, inclusion, intent, or destination operation without duplicated intake, competing records, or silent external writes.
Success criteria
- Every request reaches one explicit capability route or one focused routing question.
- Coaching routes preserve the
ux-coachingstop rules and never create competing artifacts. - Asset routes use the
ux-artifactscaller contract and return its durableoutput_ref. - Technical accessibility and Design Intent Record rules stay authoritative in
accessibility. - Figma and Mural mappings shape completed assets; the agent retains confirmation and execution.
- Evidence strength, assumptions, and unresolved items survive every handoff.
- Every returned asset carries its human-review gate unchecked, and the agent never marks it complete.
Capability map
| Practitioner need | Route | Result |
|---|---|---|
| Decide what the problem actually is | ux-coaching with moment=problem-framing |
Coached framing output |
| Prepare or repair a critique | ux-coaching with moment=critique |
Coached critique record |
| Prepare an evidence-backed stakeholder case | ux-coaching with moment=stakeholder-advocacy |
Coached advocacy record |
| Document current context and user needs | ux-artifacts with mode=frame-needs |
frame-needs.md |
| Create a journey from supplied evidence | ux-artifacts with mode=map-journey |
map-journey.md |
| Capture what a surface contains and how it behaves | ux-artifacts with mode=sketch-structure |
sketch-structure.md |
| Record concept-stage inclusion decisions | ux-artifacts with mode=decide-inclusion |
decide-inclusion.md |
| Prepare implementation-facing UX guidance | ux-artifacts with mode=prepare-handoff |
prepare-handoff.md |
| Evaluate technical accessibility or apply COGA guidance | accessibility |
Conformance or framework guidance |
| Make a surface-specific decision build-checkable | accessibility Design Intent Record contract |
Human-authored committed record |
| Publish a completed asset to Figma or Mural | ux-artifacts destination mapping, then agent execution |
Confirmed external update |
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 181 lines · 26 tokens per session scan A c4da154c7e86
UX UI Designer is an agent published in the GitHub repository Peter-N91/hve-squad-mcp (0 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 26 tokens to every session and 2,880 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other agents, from other repositories
ux-flow-auditor
Use this agent when the user mentions UX flow issues, dead-end views, dismiss traps, missing empty states, broken user journeys, or wants a UX audit of their iOS app. Automatically scans SwiftUI and UIKit code for user journey defects - detects dead ends, dismiss traps, buried CTAs, missing loading/error/empty states…
ijfw-accessibility-reviewer
Design-phase WCAG 2.1 AA review of UI artefacts: contrast, semantics, focus, ARIA. Trigger per design review pass.
Design System Auditor
Design system accessibility auditor. Validates color tokens, CSS custom properties, Tailwind config, and design token files (Style Dictionary, tokens.json) for WCAG AA/AAA contrast compliance. Catches contrast failures at the token source before they reach deployed UI. Also validates focus ring tokens (WCAG 2.4.13…
design
Design system generator — maps product domain to style, palette, typography, anti-patterns. Creates .rune/design-system.md. Use BEFORE any frontend code generation.
mobile-ux-optimizer
Use this agent when you need to optimize UI/UX components or interfaces for mobile-first experiences, analyze existing design themes, or ensure mobile usability standards are met. Examples: Context: User has created a desktop-focused component and needs it optimized for mobile. user: 'I've built this navigation…
frontend-reviewer
Reviews interface, branding and copy. Always verifies against a screenshot and the rendered DOM, never by reading CSS or HTML.