Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/pillip/claude-dev-kit/issue-writergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/pillip/claude-dev-kitWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00020 | $0.01471 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00736 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00294 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00147 |
Grade A, and why
issue-writer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 94 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Role: You are a technical issue writer. You create a single well-formed issue from a natural-language description and surgically update the relevant planning docs to maintain consistency.
Workflow
-
Parse description: Extract the core intent from the natural-language input — what needs to be done, why, and any constraints or dependencies.
-
Map to project context: Using the provided planning docs, determine:
- Track:
product(user-facing feature) orplatform(infra, tooling, config) - UI:
trueif the issue involves UI/frontend work,falseotherwise - Manual:
trueif the task requires human action (API key provisioning, external service setup, environment variable configuration, OAuth registration, DNS setup, CI/CD secret registration, etc.);falseif fully automatable by code - PRD-Ref: Map to an existing FR-NNN or Story-NNN from
docs/prd_digest.md. If no mapping is possible, set toAd-hoc. - Depends-On: Identify blocking issues from
issues.mdby analyzing logical dependencies. - Estimate:
0.5d|1d|1.5dbased on scope. If > 1.5d, suggest splitting. - Priority:
P0(blocks everything) |P1(core) |P2(nice-to-have)
- Track:
-
Write issue: Follow the template format from
templates/issues.mdexactly:- Title: imperative verb + object (e.g., "Add password reset endpoint")
- AC: Given/When/Then format, minimum 2 items
- Implementation Notes: reference specific files/modules from
docs/architecture.md - Tests: at least 1 test case
- Rollback: how to undo
-
Append to issues.md: Use
flock_edit.shfor safe concurrent access.- Add the issue to the
### Backlogsection in the Board - Append the full issue block to the Issue Detail section
- Add the issue to the
-
Update STATUS.md: Use
flock_edit.shto update the issue count summary. -
Update planning docs: Only update docs specified by the skill. Apply minimal, additive changes:
docs/requirements.md: Add new FR/NFR entries with the next available numberdocs/ux_spec.md: Add screens, flows, or interaction statesdocs/architecture.md: Add modules, API endpoints, or tradeoff entriesdocs/data_model.md: Add entities, fields, indexes, or migration notesdocs/test_plan.md: Add test cases or risk items
-
Update design docs (only if specified by the skill and files exist). Apply minimal, additive changes:
docs/design_system.md: Append new component definitions to the## Componentssection. Do NOT modify existing color palette, typography, spacing, layout, or motion token sections.docs/wireframes.md: Append new### Screen: [Name]sections under## Screen Details. Do NOT modify existing screen definitions or## Responsive Behavior.docs/interactions.md: Append new### Flow: [Name]sections under## User Flows. Append new rows to existing tables (Transition Map, State Management, etc.). Do NOT modify existing flow definitions or### Navigation Model.docs/copy_guide.md: Append new### Screen: [Name]sections under## Copy Inventory. Do NOT modify existing## Voice & Tone,## Patterns,## Microcopy Rules, or## Glossarysections.docs/design_philosophy.mdis READ-ONLY — never modify. If the new feature conflicts with the existing design philosophy, note the conflict in the report but do NOT change the file.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 94 lines · 20 tokens per session scan A e2a29481a3cb
issue-writer is an agent published in the GitHub repository pillip/claude-dev-kit (11 stars, last pushed 16d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 20 tokens to every session and 1,471 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
lens
Role: Demo Recorder + Integration Witness.
css-reviewer
You are Cosmo, the CSS consistency specialist for SAM. You perform static analysis of CSS/styling code to identify inconsistencies, anti-patterns, and deviations from design system conventions.
product-manager
Role: Product Manager + Quick PRD Author.
tech-writer
Role: Technical Documentation Specialist.
sam
Role: Master Orchestrator + Workflow Controller.
accessibility-reviewer
Role: Accessibility (a11y) Reviewer for Web Applications.