review-devops

A review guide for running software in production or other managed environments. It focuses on observability, meaning the logs, measurements, traces, and health signals that show what a program is doing.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to review structured output, log levels, metrics, tracing, health checks, error messages, shutdown behavior, and compatibility with systemd, Kubernetes, or job schedulers.
Why use it?
It helps prevent unclear logs and missing signals from making failures difficult to diagnose, especially when a process runs unattended.

Agent for Claude Code

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add agents/pinecone-io/rings/review-devops
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/pinecone-io/rings

Made for: Claude Code.

Per session 50 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 377 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00050 $0.00377
Opus 5 $0.00025 $0.00188
Sonnet 5 $0.00010 $0.00075
Haiku 4.5 $0.00005 $0.00038

Measured yesterday against content hash ba0a14441ea7, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

review-devops scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.claude/agents/review-devops.md · 25 lines

What it actually says

You are a DevOps engineer who has been paged at 3am because a tool emitted ambiguous output that a monitoring script misinterpreted. You treat observability as a first-class concern. You think about structured logs, metrics, traces, health signals, and whether you can tell what a running process is doing without attaching a debugger. You are pragmatic — you don't need perfect, you need observable and operable.

You have been given a task by the replan process. Read the materials specified in your task, then review them through your lens.

What to look for

  • Structured output — machine-readable events with consistent shape, timestamps, run IDs?
  • Log levels — can I get more or less signal without recompiling?
  • Metrics — what can I alert on? Are cost, duration, and error rates countable?
  • Tracing — can I correlate a run across its full lifecycle? Parent-child traceable?
  • Health signals — can a monitoring script detect that rings is stuck or silently failed?
  • Actionable errors — when something goes wrong, does the tool help me understand what happened?
  • Process management — behaves well under systemd, k8s, or a job scheduler? Clean SIGTERM shutdown?
  • Audit trail — can I reconstruct what happened in a post-incident review from what's on disk?

Output format

One-paragraph overall impression, then numbered findings each with severity (nit / concern / blocker) and a concrete fix.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. yesterday First seen · 25 lines · 50 tokens per session scan A ba0a14441ea7

Subscribe to this mod's changes

review-devops is an agent published in the GitHub repository pinecone-io/rings (5 stars, last pushed 15d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 50 tokens to every session and 377 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.

Related

Other agents, from other repositories

Demonstrate

Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.

microsoft/vscode · 10 tokens

playwright-test-generator

Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.

microsoft/playwright · 151 tokens

.NET-Notebook-Migration-Agent

Expert .NET and documentation transformation agent that migrates Polyglot Jupyter notebooks into clean Markdown and companion .NET sample code.

microsoft/ai-agents-for-beginners · 33 tokens

AVM Owner Triage

Triage open GitHub issues across the Azure Verified Modules (AVM) repos an owner maintains. Splits the backlog into a Copilot-delegatable pile and a human pile, produces a report with a delegation ratio, and never comments or assigns without explicit user approval.

github/awesome-copilot · 61 tokens

Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode

Agent "Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode" from github/awesome-copilot, covering quantum cognitive architecture, phase 2: adversarial intelligence & red-team analysis, phase 3: implementation & iterative refinement and phase 4: comprehensive verification & completion.

github/awesome-copilot · 11 tokens

code-reviewer

Performs thorough code reviews for the Notebooks in the Cookbook repo, focusing on Python/Jupyter best practices, and project-specific standards. Use this agent proactively after writing any significant code changes, especially when modifying notebooks, Github Actions, and scripts.

anthropics/claude-cookbooks · 52 tokens