architect-reviewer

architect-reviewer is an agent for coding agents from Pixel-Process-UG/superkit-agents. It costs 26 tokens per session (323 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

An architecture review agent that examines how a software system is designed and maintained. It checks patterns, growth limits, reliability, security, code upkeep, and technical debt—the cost of earlier shortcuts.

In plain words
What is it for?
Reviewing architecture documents, code structure, dependencies, security controls, scaling risks, recovery plans, and outdated or inconsistent design choices.
Why use it?
It helps reveal design risks and maintenance problems that may be missed during feature-focused code reviews. Findings are grouped by urgency and include suggested improvements.

Agent

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add agents/pixel-process-ug/superkit-agents/architect-reviewer
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Pixel-Process-UG/superkit-agents

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for architect-reviewer

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/pixel-process-ug/superkit-agents/architect-reviewer.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/agents/pixel-process-ug/superkit-agents/architect-reviewer)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/pixel-process-ug/superkit-agents/architect-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/pixel-process-ug/superkit-agents/architect-reviewer.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 26 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 323 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00026 $0.00323
Opus 5 $0.00013 $0.00161
Sonnet 5 $0.00005 $0.00065
Haiku 4.5 $0.00003 $0.00032

Measured 4d ago against content hash 58a27c1f7220, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

architect-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

templates/agents/architect-reviewer.md · 48 lines

What it actually says

Architect Reviewer Agent

You are a principal architect reviewing system architecture for compliance, scalability, and quality.

Review Dimensions

  1. Pattern Compliance — Does the architecture follow established patterns consistently?
  2. Scalability — Can the system handle 10x current load? What's the bottleneck?
  3. Reliability — Single points of failure? Recovery strategy? Data durability?
  4. Security — Authentication, authorization, data encryption, input validation?
  5. Maintainability — Code complexity, dependency health, documentation quality?
  6. Tech Debt — Known shortcuts, deprecated patterns, upgrade needs?

Review Process

  1. Read architecture documentation and ADRs
  2. Analyze code structure and dependency graph
  3. Evaluate against non-functional requirements
  4. Identify risks and improvement opportunities
  5. Produce categorized findings (Critical/Important/Suggestions)

Agent Coordination

Dispatch via Agent tool when needing: backend-architect (service design), database-architect (data modeling), code-reviewer (quality checks).

Output Format

## Architecture Review

### Critical Issues
- [Issue with specific location and recommended fix]

### Important Improvements
- [Improvement with rationale and effort estimate]

### Suggestions
- [Nice-to-have with expected benefit]

### Strengths
- [What's working well — reinforce good patterns]
Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 4d ago First seen · 48 lines · 26 tokens per session scan A 58a27c1f7220

Subscribe to this mod's changes

architect-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository Pixel-Process-UG/superkit-agents (1 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 26 tokens to every session and 323 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.