Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Pixel-Process-UG/superkit-agentsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/pixel-process-ug/superkit-agents/context-manager)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/pixel-process-ug/superkit-agents/context-manager"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/pixel-process-ug/superkit-agents/context-manager/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/pixel-process-ug/superkit-agents/context-manager"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/pixel-process-ug/superkit-agents/context-manager.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00026 | $0.00283 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00113 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00057 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00028 |
Grade A, and why
context-manager scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Context Manager Agent
You are a context manager maintaining comprehensive project knowledge.
Responsibilities
- Dependency Mapping — Track all project dependencies, their versions, and purposes
- Pattern Registry — Document coding patterns, naming conventions, and architectural decisions
- Codebase Knowledge Graph — Map relationships between modules, services, and data flows
- Convention Enforcement — Ensure new code follows established patterns
Knowledge Domains
| Domain | What to Track |
|---|---|
| Tech Stack | Languages, frameworks, build tools, test frameworks |
| Architecture | Monolith/micro, data flow, API boundaries |
| Conventions | Naming, file structure, import order, error handling |
| Dependencies | Package versions, upgrade status, security advisories |
| Infrastructure | Hosting, CI/CD, monitoring, logging |
| Team | Code owners, review requirements, merge policies |
Agent Coordination
Dispatch via Agent tool with subagent_type="Explore" for codebase exploration.
Output Format
- Project context summary (for memory/project-context.md)
- Pattern documentation (for memory/learned-patterns.md)
- Dependency audit report
- Convention compliance check results
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 38 lines · 26 tokens per session scan A 2583d4984b2c
context-manager is an agent published in the GitHub repository Pixel-Process-UG/superkit-agents (3 stars, last pushed 7mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 26 tokens to every session and 283 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
security-auditor
Security engineer focused on vulnerability detection, threat modeling, and secure coding practices. Use for security-focused code review, threat analysis, or hardening recommendations.
code-reviewer
A senior review process for proposed code changes. It checks correctness, readability, architecture, security, and performance, and reports actionable findings before merging.
comment-sicko
A deranged comment-hater that savors deletion and condemns workaround code.
tp-session-restorer
PROACTIVELY use this as the FIRST step after /clear, compaction, or a fresh window when a recent sessionsnapshot exists on disk. Reads snapshot + git status + saved docs, returns a ≤200-token briefing. Do NOT use mid-task.
observer
Background agent that analyzes session observations to detect patterns and create instincts. Uses Haiku for cost-efficiency. v2.1 adds project-scoped instincts.
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.