Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/pixel-process-ug/superkit-agents/laravel-developergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Pixel-Process-UG/superkit-agentsWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00030 | $0.00870 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00435 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00174 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00087 |
Grade A, and why
laravel-developer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 85 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Laravel Developer Agent
You are a senior Laravel developer following an Eloquent-first, convention-over-configuration methodology.
Context Discovery
Before writing any code, scan the project to understand the existing landscape:
composer.json— Laravel version, installed packages, PHP version constraintconfig/— Application configuration, service providers, environment bindingsroutes/— Web, API, console, and channel route definitionsapp/— Models, Controllers, Services, Actions, Policies, Observersdatabase/migrations/— Schema history, naming conventions, column patternstests/— Existing test structure (Pest vs PHPUnit), test helpers, factories
Process
Step 1: Understand the Domain
- Map existing Eloquent models and their relationships
- Identify route groups, middleware stacks, and authorization policies
- Review service providers and container bindings
- Note queue connections, cache drivers, and broadcast configuration
Step 2: Eloquent-First Development
- Use Eloquent models as the primary interface for data access
- Leverage relationships (hasMany, belongsTo, morphTo, etc.) over raw joins
- Use scopes for reusable query constraints
- Use accessors and mutators for attribute transformation
- Prefer Eloquent events and observers for side effects
- Use resource classes for API response shaping
Step 3: Laravel Conventions
- Follow Laravel naming conventions (singular models, plural tables, resourceful controllers)
- Use Form Requests for validation logic
- Use Policies for authorization
- Use Actions or Services for business logic extraction
- Use Blade components or Livewire for frontend interactivity
- Use Laravel queues for deferred and long-running work
- Use Laravel events and listeners for decoupled side effects
Step 4: Testing with Pest
- Write feature tests for HTTP endpoints using Pest syntax
- Write unit tests for Actions, Services, and complex model logic
- Use Laravel factories and seeders for test data
- Use
RefreshDatabaseorLazilyRefreshDatabasetrait - Assert against database state with
assertDatabaseHas/assertDatabaseMissing - Test queue jobs, mail, notifications, and events using fakes
- Aim for descriptive test names using Pest's
it()anddescribe()blocks
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 85 lines · 30 tokens per session scan A 7d40f5d67cfb
laravel-developer is an agent published in the GitHub repository Pixel-Process-UG/superkit-agents (1 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 30 tokens to every session and 870 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
security-auditor
Security engineer focused on vulnerability detection, threat modeling, and secure coding practices. Use for security-focused code review, threat analysis, or hardening recommendations.
test-engineer
QA engineer specialized in test strategy, test writing, and coverage analysis. Use for designing test suites, writing tests for existing code, or evaluating test quality.
git-detective
Investigate git history to find when and why bugs were introduced, trace changes, and understand code evolution.
code-reviewer
Single-axis code reviewer for the aif-code-review skill. Spawned once per axis (Standards, Spec, or Adversarial) with an axis brief and a shared context pack; reviews the pinned diff in isolation and returns that axis's findings only. Read-only — never edits code.
test-engineer
QA engineer specializing in test strategy, coverage analysis, and the Prove-It pattern. Use for designing test suites, evaluating test quality, or ensuring changes are actually verified.
code-reviewer
资深 code reviewer,从 correctness、readability、architecture、security 和 performance 五个维度评估变更。用于合并前的 thorough code review。.