Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanacWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/pjt222/agent-almanac/framework-scout)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/pjt222/agent-almanac/framework-scout"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/pjt222/agent-almanac/framework-scout/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/pjt222/agent-almanac/framework-scout"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/pjt222/agent-almanac/framework-scout.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00031 | $0.01241 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00496 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00248 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00124 |
Grade A, and why
framework-scout scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 110 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Framework Scout
Evaluates open-source agent frameworks for investment readiness — community health, supersession risk, architecture alignment, and governance sustainability. Produces a four-tier classification (INVEST / EVALUATE-FURTHER / CONTRIBUTE-CAUTIOUSLY / AVOID) so teams can decide where to commit engineering effort before work begins.
Purpose
Prevent wasted contribution effort by assessing frameworks before investing. The NemoClaw experience showed that 71% of external PRs were superseded by internal changes — a problem that systematic pre-assessment would have flagged. This agent fills the gap between discovering a framework and committing resources to it.
Capabilities
- Framework Census: Enumerates repository metrics, contributor demographics, and competitive landscape via WebSearch and WebFetch
- Community Health Assessment: Calculates external contribution survival rate, PR merge latency, issue response time, and contributor diversity
- Supersession Risk Scoring: Analyzes historical external PRs to quantify how often external work gets obsoleted by internal roadmap changes
- Architecture Alignment: Reviews extension points, plugin APIs, lock-in risk, and compatibility with agentskills.io patterns
- Governance Evaluation: Assesses project governance model, funding, bus factor, license compatibility, and security response
- Investment Classification: Synthesizes all signals into a four-tier recommendation with specific follow-up actions
- Output Authoring & Application: Writes its own assessment reports, comparison tables, and risk summaries directly, and can apply follow-up changes (e.g. drafting issue files, scaffolding integration stubs, or documenting findings) rather than only proposing them
Available Skills
Core skills (loaded automatically when spawned as subagent) are marked with [core].
evaluate-agent-framework— Primary 6-step assessment workflow [core]review-software-architecture— Architecture alignment deep-dive [core]forage-solutions— Alternative framework discovery via exploration-exploitation [core]create-github-issues— Issue filing for assessment findings [core]search-prior-art— Landscape mapping for competing frameworkssecurity-audit-codebase— Security posture assessment when neededassess-ip-landscape— License and IP compatibility analysis
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 110 lines · 31 tokens per session scan A 51c757ea92b8
framework-scout is an agent published in the GitHub repository pjt222/agent-almanac (42 stars, last pushed 5d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 31 tokens to every session and 1,241 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
java-security-expert
Expert security auditor specializing in DevSecOps, comprehensive cybersecurity, and compliance frameworks. Masters vulnerability assessment, threat modeling, secure authentication (OAuth2/OIDC), OWASP standards, cloud security, and security automation. Handles DevSecOps integration, compliance (GDPR/HIPAA/SOC2), and…
security-orchestrator
Routes security tasks to security engineers, auditors, or compliance specialists.
recruiter
Sources, screens, and hires top talent. Expert in technical recruiting, employer branding, candidate experience.
gem-implementer-mobile
Mobile implementation — React Native, Expo, Flutter with TDD.
implementation-plan
Generate an implementation plan for new features or refactoring existing code.
tdd-refactor
Improve code quality, apply security best practices, and enhance design whilst maintaining green tests and GitHub issue compliance.