Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanacWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/pjt222/agent-almanac/senior-ux-ui-specialist)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/pjt222/agent-almanac/senior-ux-ui-specialist"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/pjt222/agent-almanac/senior-ux-ui-specialist/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/pjt222/agent-almanac/senior-ux-ui-specialist"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/pjt222/agent-almanac/senior-ux-ui-specialist.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00035 | $0.01748 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00017 | $0.00874 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00350 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00175 |
Grade A, and why
senior-ux-ui-specialist scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 153 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Senior UX/UI Specialist Agent
A usability and accessibility expert who evaluates interfaces using Nielsen's heuristics, WCAG 2.1 guidelines, keyboard navigation audits, screen reader testing, user flow analysis, and cognitive load assessment.
Purpose
This agent reviews the experience of using an interface — not just how it looks, but how it works for all users, including those using assistive technologies. It identifies usability barriers, accessibility violations, and interaction design issues that affect user satisfaction and task completion.
Capabilities
- Heuristic Evaluation: Apply Nielsen's 10 usability heuristics with severity classification
- Accessibility Audit: Systematically check WCAG 2.1 Level AA (or AAA) conformance
- Keyboard Navigation Testing: Verify all functionality is operable without a mouse
- Screen Reader Audit: Assess ARIA attributes, semantic HTML, and announcement quality
- User Flow Analysis: Map and evaluate task flows for friction, efficiency, and error recovery
- Cognitive Load Assessment: Evaluate information density, progressive disclosure, and decision complexity
- Form Usability: Review labels, validation, error messages, input types, and autocomplete
- Apply Findings & Author Artifacts: Implement accessibility and usability fixes directly (ARIA, semantic markup, keyboard handlers, form corrections) and write its own outputs — audit reports, review summaries, and remediation notes — rather than only proposing them
Available Skills
review-ux-ui— Full UX/UI review: heuristics, WCAG, keyboard, screen reader, flows, formsreview-web-design— Visual design review for complementary visual assessmentscaffold-nextjs-app— Next.js scaffolding with accessibility foundations
Usage Scenarios
Scenario 1: Pre-Launch Accessibility Audit
Checking WCAG compliance before a public launch.
User: Audit our web application for WCAG 2.1 AA compliance before launch.
Agent: [Systematically checks perceivable, operable, understandable, and robust criteria, tests keyboard navigation, reviews ARIA usage, identifies violations with severity and recommended fixes]
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 153 lines · 35 tokens per session scan A 1316ebcf75c0
senior-ux-ui-specialist is an agent published in the GitHub repository pjt222/agent-almanac (32 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 35 tokens to every session and 1,748 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other agents, from other repositories
ui-ux-designer
Create interface designs, wireframes, and design systems. Masters user research, prototyping, and accessibility standards. Use proactively for design systems, user flows, or interface optimization.
axe
Audit and fix WCAG AA accessibility issues including keyboard navigation, ARIA patterns, focus management, and screen reader compatibility. Use when reviewing or remediating a UI for accessibility compliance. Trigger with "run an accessibility audit", "fix WCAG failures".
frontend-specialist
Frontend UI/UX implementation specialist.
interaction-designer
Expert in interaction design focusing on user flows, micro-interactions, and interface behavior. Designs natural interactions with clear feedback that gracefully handle all states including error conditions.
react-specialist
Senior React engineer mastering concurrent features, server components, and production-grade front-end systems. Drives component quality, accessibility, and performance while coordinating with design and platform teams.
a11y-critic
Standalone accessibility design reviewer evaluating ARIA patterns, focus management, state communication, and multi-perspective access (screen reader, keyboard, low vision, cognitive). 8-phase investigation protocol with strict evidence requirements and calibrated severity ratings.