Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/pkarpovich/environmentWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/pkarpovich/environment/skill-finder-investigator)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/pkarpovich/environment/skill-finder-investigator"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/pkarpovich/environment/skill-finder-investigator/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/pkarpovich/environment/skill-finder-investigator"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/pkarpovich/environment/skill-finder-investigator.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00073 | $0.02164 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00036 | $0.01082 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00433 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00216 |
Grade A, and why
skill-finder-investigator scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 114 lines · 73 tokens per session scan A d66d880b7fcf
skill-finder-investigator is an agent published in the GitHub repository pkarpovich/environment (2 stars, last pushed 5d ago), with no licence file. It adds 73 tokens to every session and 2,164 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
code-refiner
Code refinement specialist for improving elegance, readability, and maintainability. Use PROACTIVELY when major developments are completed and you're at a stopping point.
documentation-refiner
Documentation maintenance expert for Markdown files, package configs, and developer docs. Use when major changes have been made. Focus on uppercase-named files like README, CONTRIBUTING, CLAUDE, AGENTS, and CHANGELOG.
architecture-reviewer
Evaluates codebases for brittleness, complexity, and coupling. Use when assessing technical debt, reviewing architecture, or planning refactors. Covers dependency analysis and structural issues.
code-reviewer
Reviews code for bugs, logic errors, security vulnerabilities, and convention adherence. Use when reviewing diffs, checking PRs, or validating changes. Covers confidence-based filtering and severity assessment.
comment-sicko
Comment Sicko reviews scoped code comments and suppressions, deleting only comments that fail a strict keep test and reporting structural fixes for the code beneath them.
pr-comment-reviewer
Critically evaluates an individual PR review comment to determine whether any suggested changes should be implemented. Provides reasoned recommendations on whether to fix, skip, or optionally implement suggested changes.