Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/poindexter12/waypointWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/poindexter12/waypoint/coordinator)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/poindexter12/waypoint/coordinator"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/poindexter12/waypoint/coordinator/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/poindexter12/waypoint/coordinator"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/poindexter12/waypoint/coordinator.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00031 | $0.04609 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.01844 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00922 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00461 |
Grade A, and why
claire-coordinator scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 568 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Claire Coordinator Agent
Meta-coordinator determining optimal Claude Code component type (agent/command/skill), then delegating to specialist for creation.
INVOCATION DECISION TREE
INPUT: user_message
PHASE 1: Explicit Type Detection (highest priority)
IF user_message matches "create (an? )?(agent|command|skill)" → DO_NOT_INVOKE, route to specialist
IF user_message matches "modify.*?(agent|command|skill)" → DO_NOT_INVOKE, route to specialist
IF user_message matches "fix.*?(agent|command|skill)" → DO_NOT_INVOKE, route to specialist
IF user_message matches "update.*?(agent|command|skill)" → DO_NOT_INVOKE, route to specialist
CONTINUE to PHASE 2
PHASE 2: Anti-Pattern Detection
IF user_message matches "how (do I|to) use Claude Code" → DO_NOT_INVOKE (general Claude question)
IF user_message matches "fix.*typo|spelling|grammar" → DO_NOT_INVOKE (simple edit task)
IF user_message matches "what is.*Claude Code" → DO_NOT_INVOKE (documentation question)
IF user_message contains "claude.*question|help|explain" AND NOT contains "agent|command|skill|create|build" → DO_NOT_INVOKE
CONTINUE to PHASE 3
PHASE 3: Pattern Matching with Scoring
SCORE = 0.0
# Intent signals
IF user_message matches "(should I|what should I|which should I) (make|create|build|use)" → SCORE += 0.35
IF user_message matches "I (want|need) (something|a way|help|tool) (to|for)" → SCORE += 0.30
IF user_message matches "help me (build|create|make)" → SCORE += 0.30
# Component-type mention (but not explicit)
IF user_message contains_any ["agent vs command", "command vs skill", "agent or skill"] → SCORE += 0.40
IF user_message contains "difference between" AND contains_any ["agent", "command", "skill"] → SCORE += 0.40
# Uncertainty signals
IF user_message contains_any ["not sure", "don't know", "uncertain", "confused"] → SCORE += 0.20
IF user_message ends_with "?" AND contains_any ["agent", "command", "skill"] → SCORE += 0.15
CONTINUE to PHASE 4
PHASE 4: Decision with Confidence Threshold
IF SCORE >= 0.70 → INVOKE coordinator
IF SCORE >= 0.40 AND SCORE < 0.70 → ASK_CLARIFICATION
IF SCORE < 0.40 → DO_NOT_INVOKE
CLARIFICATION_TEMPLATE (when 0.40 <= SCORE < 0.70):
"I can help determine whether to create an agent, command, or skill. Could you describe:
1. What action/capability you need
2. How you'll trigger it (slash command vs conversation vs keyword)
3. Whether it's one-time or ongoing assistance"
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 568 lines · 31 tokens per session scan A 5c6ae5f2c1f4
claire-coordinator is an agent published in the GitHub repository poindexter12/waypoint (7 stars, last pushed 9mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 31 tokens to every session and 4,609 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
.NET-Notebook-Migration-Agent
Expert .NET and documentation transformation agent that migrates Polyglot Jupyter notebooks into clean Markdown and companion .NET sample code.
AVM Owner Triage
Triage open GitHub issues across the Azure Verified Modules (AVM) repos an owner maintains. Splits the backlog into a Copilot-delegatable pile and a human pile, produces a report with a delegation ratio, and never comments or assigns without explicit user approval.
Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode
Agent "Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode" from github/awesome-copilot, covering quantum cognitive architecture, phase 2: adversarial intelligence & red-team analysis, phase 3: implementation & iterative refinement and phase 4: comprehensive verification & completion.
Context7-Expert
Expert in latest library versions, best practices, and correct syntax using up-to-date documentation.
code-reviewer
Performs thorough code reviews for the Notebooks in the Cookbook repo, focusing on Python/Jupyter best practices, and project-specific standards. Use this agent proactively after writing any significant code changes, especially when modifying notebooks, Github Actions, and scripts.