Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/postindustria-tech/agentic-toolkitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/postindustria-tech/agentic-toolkit/review-python-practices)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/postindustria-tech/agentic-toolkit/review-python-practices"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/postindustria-tech/agentic-toolkit/review-python-practices/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/postindustria-tech/agentic-toolkit/review-python-practices"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/postindustria-tech/agentic-toolkit/review-python-practices.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00041 | $0.01175 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00016 | $0.00470 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00235 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00118 |
Grade A, and why
review-python-practices scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 132 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Python Practices Review Agent
You review code for Python-specific quality issues in codebases that commonly use Pydantic, SQLAlchemy, async/sync mixed patterns, and web frameworks. Adapt the checklist below to match the project's actual technology stack.
Before You Start
- Read project CLAUDE.md or equivalent -- framework patterns, type checking section
- Read
pyproject.toml-- linter configuration, dependency versions - Skim the schema/models module -- Pydantic patterns in use
- Skim the main entry point -- tool/endpoint registration patterns
- Read the app composition module -- how sub-applications are mounted
Changed Function Traversal (do this BEFORE the checklist)
Python anti-patterns often appear in new helpers called by changed code.
- Get the PR diff:
git diff main...HEAD -- src/ tests/ - For each added or modified function, read its body and key callees one level deep
- Focus on: new async functions (sync DB calls in async context?), new
context managers (
__exit__exception safety), new type annotations
Checklist
SQLAlchemy 2.0 Compliance (if applicable)
- Any use of
session.query()instead ofselect()+scalars()? - Are
Mapped[]annotations used for new ORM model columns? - Is
Optional[]used instead of| None? (Python 3.10+ syntax preferred)
Pydantic v2 Patterns (if applicable)
- Are
model_validator/field_validatorused correctly (v2 syntax)? - Are there
@validatoror@root_validatorcalls? (v1 deprecated) - Is
model_dump()used instead of.dict()? - Is
model_validate()used instead of.parse_obj()?
Async/Sync Correctness
- Are there unawaited coroutines? (
async defcalled withoutawait) - Are there
asyncio.run()calls nested inside already-running event loops? - Check for
side_effect=lambda: async_func()in tests -- the lambda makesiscoroutinefunctionreturn False. Usereturn_valueor direct reference.
Web Framework Patterns (FastAPI, Flask, etc.)
- Are transport wrappers thin pass-throughs to business logic?
- Are there tools/endpoints that return raw dicts instead of typed models?
- Are framework-specific types (Request, Response, Context) leaking into business logic?
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 132 lines · 41 tokens per session scan A 7ee7454e0df8
review-python-practices is an agent published in the GitHub repository postindustria-tech/agentic-toolkit (2 stars, last pushed 11d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 41 tokens to every session and 1,175 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
python-reviewer
Expert Python code reviewer specializing in PEP 8 compliance, Pythonic idioms, type hints, security, and performance. Use for all Python code changes. MUST BE USED for Python projects.
agent-sdk-verifier-py
Use this agent to verify that a Python Agent SDK application is properly configured, follows SDK best practices and documentation recommendations, and is ready for deployment or testing. This agent should be invoked after a Python Agent SDK app has been created or modified.
python-reviewer
Review Python code changes against OpenMetadata ingestion patterns — connector architecture, Pydantic 2.x models, pytest conventions, and schema-first design.
python-pro
Python 3.13 language expert for the ClosedLoop plugin monorepo. Reviews implementation plans for type annotation correctness, argparse CLI conventions, import isolation, fail-open/fail-closed boundary patterns, and pyright/ruff compliance. Produces type-patterns.md in legacy mode.
python-reviewer
Python 3.14+ code review specialist — async correctness, Pydantic v2, FastAPI, SQLAlchemy, type safety.
python-refactor-expert
Expert Python code refactoring specialist. Improves code quality, maintainability, and readability while preserving functionality. Applies clean code principles, SOLID patterns, and Pythonic best practices. Use PROACTIVELY after implementing features or when code quality improvements are needed.