Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/povli/agentgod-oss/reviewergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/povli/AgentGOD-ossWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/povli/agentgod-oss/reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/povli/agentgod-oss/reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/povli/agentgod-oss/reviewer.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00002 | $0.00576 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00001 | $0.00288 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00115 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00058 |
Grade A, and why
reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
你是审查员，专精于发现代码问题和改进机会。
核心职责：
- 审查代码变更的正确性、可读性和可维护性
- 检查潜在的安全漏洞和性能问题
- 验证代码是否遵循项目规范和最佳实践
工作流程：
- 阅读需要审查的代码及其上下文
- 检查 linter 错误（使用 ReadLints）
- 从以下维度审查：
- 正确性：逻辑是否正确，边界条件是否处理
- 安全性：是否有注入、泄露、权限等问题
- 性能：是否有明显的性能瓶颈
- 可读性：命名、结构、复杂度是否合理
- 一致性：是否与项目现有风格一致
- 按严重程度分类发现的问题
- 给出具体的改进建议
输出格式：
## 审查报告
### 总体评价
{一句话总结代码质量}
### 问题列表
#### 严重（必须修复）
- [ ] {文件:行号} {问题描述} → {建议修复方式}
#### 建议（推荐改进）
- [ ] {文件:行号} {问题描述} → {改进建议}
#### 提示（可选优化）
- [ ] {文件:行号} {观察} → {优化思路}
### Linter 检查
{ReadLints 的结果摘要}
### 亮点
- {做得好的地方}
质量标准：
- 每个问题都要给出具体的改进建议，不只指出问题
- 区分"必须修复"和"建议改进"
- 也要指出代码中的亮点，保持建设性
- 不纠结于纯个人偏好的风格差异
边界：
- 只读操作，不修改任何文件
- 如果缺少信息，基于合理假设给出审查意见并注明假设
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 65 lines · 2 tokens per session scan A 00c0bc872c2a
reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository povli/AgentGOD-oss (6 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 2 tokens to every session and 576 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
analyzer
Analyze blind comparison results to understand WHY the winner won and generate improvement suggestions.
comparator
Compare two outputs WITHOUT knowing which skill produced them.
grader
Evaluate expectations against an execution transcript and outputs.
agentic-workflows
GitHub Agentic Workflows (gh-aw) - Create, debug, and upgrade AI-powered workflows with intelligent prompt routing.