Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/pr-pm/prpmWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/pr-pm/prpm/testing-patterns)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/pr-pm/prpm/testing-patterns"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/pr-pm/prpm/testing-patterns/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/pr-pm/prpm/testing-patterns"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/pr-pm/prpm/testing-patterns.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00032 | $0.00723 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00013 | $0.00289 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00145 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00072 |
Grade A, and why
prpm-testing-patterns scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 112 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
PRPM Testing Patterns
Expert guidance for testing the Prompt Package Manager codebase with Vitest.
Testing Philosophy
Test Pyramid for PRPM
- 70% Unit Tests: Format converters, parsers, utilities
- 20% Integration Tests: API routes, database operations, CLI commands
- 10% E2E Tests: Full workflows (install, publish, search)
Coverage Goals
- Format Converters: 100% coverage (critical path)
- CLI Commands: 90% coverage
- API Routes: 85% coverage
- Utilities: 90% coverage
Test Structure
Organize Test Files
src/
converters/
to-cursor.ts
__tests__/
setup.ts # Shared fixtures
to-cursor.test.ts # Converter tests
roundtrip.test.ts # Round-trip validation
Key Testing Patterns
Format Converter Tests
describe('toCursor', () => {
it('preserves all data in roundtrip', () => {
const result = toCursor(canonical);
const back = fromCursor(result.content);
expect(back).toEqual(canonical);
});
it('flags lossy conversions', () => {
const result = toCursor(canonicalWithClaudeSpecific);
expect(result.lossyConversion).toBe(true);
expect(result.qualityScore).toBeLessThan(100);
});
});
CLI Command Tests
describe('install command', () => {
it('downloads and installs package', async () => {
await handleInstall('test-package', { as: 'cursor' });
expect(fs.existsSync('.cursor/rules/test-package.md')).toBe(true);
});
});
Integration Tests
describe('registry API', () => {
it('searches packages with filters', async () => {
const results = await searchPackages({
query: 'react',
category: 'frontend'
});
expect(results.length).toBeGreaterThan(0);
});
});
Best Practices
- Test Isolation: Each test should be independent
- Clear Assertions: Use descriptive expect messages
- Mock External Services: Don't hit real APIs in tests
- Test Edge Cases: Empty inputs, null values, large datasets
- Performance: Keep unit tests under 100ms each
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 112 lines · 32 tokens per session scan A 60aab658773a
prpm-testing-patterns is an agent published in the GitHub repository pr-pm/prpm (123 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 32 tokens to every session and 723 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
backend-development-test-automator
Create comprehensive test suites including unit, integration, and E2E tests. Supports TDD/BDD workflows. Use for test creation during feature development.
testing-expert
Read-only testing reviewer. Use when designing or reviewing Swift Testing, XCTest, XCUIAutomation, snapshot or visual regression tests, fixtures, test doubles, StoreKit/CloudKit tests, Foundation Models evaluations, flaky tests, or coverage strategy. Reports recommendations and does not edit code.
test-engineer
A software testing specialist that designs test plans, writes tests, and checks which parts of code are covered. It chooses unit, integration, or end-to-end tests based on what the code does.
qa-tester
Creates and runs test suites. Use after implementing features to generate unit tests, integration tests, and E2E tests.
metago-test-engineer
Test Engineer - specializes in unit testing, integration testing, E2E testing, performance testing, security testing, and regression testing.
test-engineer
QA engineer specialized in test strategy, test writing, and coverage analysis. Use for designing test suites, writing tests for existing code, or evaluating test quality.