Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/PranavNagrecha/AwesomeSalesforceSkillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/pranavnagrecha/awesomesalesforceskills/agentforce-quality-engineer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/pranavnagrecha/awesomesalesforceskills/agentforce-quality-engineer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/pranavnagrecha/awesomesalesforceskills/agentforce-quality-engineer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/pranavnagrecha/awesomesalesforceskills/agentforce-quality-engineer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/pranavnagrecha/awesomesalesforceskills/agentforce-quality-engineer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00040 | $0.00397 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00016 | $0.00159 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00079 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00040 |
Grade A, and why
agentforce-quality-engineer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 25d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 25d ago First seen · 46 lines · 40 tokens per session scan A 2ed9b4005655
agentforce-quality-engineer is an agent published in the GitHub repository PranavNagrecha/AwesomeSalesforceSkills (23 stars, last pushed 8d ago), with no licence file. It adds 40 tokens to every session and 397 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-04.
Other agents, from other repositories
python-reviewer
Expert Python code reviewer specializing in PEP 8 compliance, Pythonic idioms, type hints, security, and performance. Use for all Python code changes. MUST BE USED for Python projects.
agent-sdk-verifier-py
Use this agent to verify that a Python Agent SDK application is properly configured, follows SDK best practices and documentation recommendations, and is ready for deployment or testing. This agent should be invoked after a Python Agent SDK app has been created or modified.
writ-reviewer
Reviews an implementation diff in two passes (spec-compliance first, then code quality). Read-only. Returns structured findings. Replaces the separate spec/code-quality reviewers.
codedna-reviewer
CodeDNA compliance reviewer. Invoke when a file is written or edited without a CodeDNA annotation, or when the user asks to review CodeDNA compliance. Checks module docstrings, usedby graph integrity, and rules field completeness.
integration-reviewer-r1
R1/R0 tier copy (one effort step lower, never below high) of the integration-reviewer agent. Read-only for repo state (no commits, no source edits that survive) fresh-context reviewer for the merged integration diff across all tasks in an orchestration run — running checks may temporarily mutate the working tree…
commit-pusher
Commits and pushes changes. Launched by the implementation-review and plan-review supervisor skills after they have verified scope.