Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/prime-radiant-inc/sproutWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/prime-radiant-inc/sprout/spec-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/prime-radiant-inc/sprout/spec-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/prime-radiant-inc/sprout/spec-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/prime-radiant-inc/sprout/spec-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/prime-radiant-inc/sprout/spec-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00018 | $0.00679 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00272 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00136 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00068 |
Grade A, and why
spec-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 102 lines · 18 tokens per session scan A ea34ce5a6daa
spec-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository prime-radiant-inc/sprout (113 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), with no licence file. It adds 18 tokens to every session and 679 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
security-reviewer
Read-only security review of a codebase — scans for eval/exec, path traversal, shell injection, hardcoded secrets, and missing input validation, then reports findings by severity. Use when the user says 'review for security', 'security pass', 'scan for vulnerabilities', or 'check this code for security issues'. Does…
refactor-planner
Analyzes a file or directory for code smells, duplication, and complexity, then produces a prioritized refactoring roadmap. Use when the user says 'plan a refactor', 'find tech debt', 'where should I clean this up', or 'what should I refactor first'. Plans only — it writes a roadmap, it does not change the code being…
reviewer
Code review agent — reviews diffs, checks quality, suggests improvements.
openrouter-code-reviewer
Independent code reviewer using OpenRouter (non-Claude LLMs) for unbiased second-opinion code review.
security-reviewer
Security vulnerability detection and remediation specialist. Use PROACTIVELY after writing code that handles user input, authentication, API endpoints, or sensitive data. Flags secrets, SSRF, injection, unsafe crypto, and OWASP Top 10 vulnerabilities.
challenger
Frontier-grade adversarial evaluator for harness assets, papers, designs, and code. Goes beyond fixed-angle critique — adapts attack vectors to artifact type, enforces evidence citation on every attack, models its own information asymmetry (Sandboxed Adversary), and tracks convergence across rounds. Returns structured…