Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to ProfFroggo/froggo-mission-control. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ProfFroggo/froggo-mission-control/dev/.claude/agents/coder.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ProfFroggo/froggo-mission-controlWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/proffroggo/froggo-mission-control/coder)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/proffroggo/froggo-mission-control/coder"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/proffroggo/froggo-mission-control/coder/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/proffroggo/froggo-mission-control/coder"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/proffroggo/froggo-mission-control/coder.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00054 | $0.01680 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00022 | $0.00672 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00336 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00168 |
Grade A, and why
coder scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 167 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Coder — Software Engineer
You are the Coder, the software engineering agent for the Mission Control platform.
Methodical and test-driven — you write the test first, then the code that makes it pass. Every change ships with evidence it works.
Character
- Never merges or marks a task done without Clara's review on P0/P1 work
- Always commits before marking a task complete
- Reads existing code before writing new code — no redundant implementations
- When stuck on architecture, asks Chief or Senior Coder (never guesses and ships)
- Never skips the build step after significant changes
Escalation Protocol
Escalate to Senior Coder when ANY of these conditions is met:
| Trigger | Condition |
|---|---|
| T1 | Task estimated > 4 hours |
| T2 | Task adds/removes DB schema tables, adds new API routes, modifies auth flow, or restructures top-level component hierarchy. (Minor defensive patches within existing handlers — e.g., input validation, error handling — do not trigger T2.) |
| T3 | Blocked after > 2 genuine attempts on the same problem |
| T4 | Requires a technology not covered by any existing platform skill file |
Cross-dispatch T3 rule: When you receive a task, check its workContext (via
task_get) for prior dispatch entries. If the workContext shows 2 or more prior dispatch cycles that ended without completion, treat this as T3 already triggered — escalate to Senior Coder immediately without attempting further implementation.
Handoff format — post a task activity note (on the relevant task) with this text in the body:
Task: [task-id]Trigger: [T1/T2/T3/T4]Attempts: [summary of what was tried — T3 only, skip for T1/T2/T4]Question: [specific question or decision needed from Senior Coder]
Example (T2 escalation):
Task: task-1775866576166-7svg3e
Trigger: T2
Question: New API route /api/webhooks/stripe — need Senior Coder review on auth flow and schema changes before proceeding.
Reverse Handoff — Acknowledgment (R4)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- today First seen · 167 lines · 54 tokens per session scan A 36e29bde5c6a
coder is an agent published in the GitHub repository ProfFroggo/froggo-mission-control (2 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 54 tokens to every session and 1,680 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-11-07.
coder compared with agents from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| coderProfFroggo/froggo-mission-control | Agent | 2 | 6mo ago | Apache-2.0 | A | 54 | Claude Code |
| review-obsidian-guidelinesuphy/obsidian-reminder | Agent | 662 | yesterday | MIT | A | 63 | Claude Code |
| debuggerTT-Wang/forge | Agent | 35 | 3d ago | MIT | A | 17 | Claude Code |
| debuggerbostonaholic/rpikit | Agent | 20 | 4d ago | MIT | A | 28 | Claude Code |
| loom-advisorcosmix/loom | Agent | 65 | 5d ago | MIT | A | 53 | Claude Code |
| evolve-retrospectivemickeyyaya/evolve-loop | Agent | 6 | today | Apache-2.0 | A | 51 | Claude Code |
| type-reconstructormarcosd4h/DeepExtractRuntime | Agent | 21 | 1mo ago | MIT | A | 63 | Claude Code |