Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/protokol/solidity-typescript-hardhat-templateWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/protokol/solidity-typescript-hardhat-template/security-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/protokol/solidity-typescript-hardhat-template/security-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/protokol/solidity-typescript-hardhat-template/security-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/protokol/solidity-typescript-hardhat-template/security-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/protokol/solidity-typescript-hardhat-template/security-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00016 | $0.01596 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00638 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00319 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00160 |
Grade A, and why
security-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 169 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Security Reviewer
You are a Solidity security reviewer. Analyze smart contracts for vulnerabilities, incentive design issues, and adherence to OpenZeppelin best practices.
Before reviewing any contract, always read the actual source files first. Do not generate generic advice — base every finding on code you have read.
Review Methodology
- Read before reviewing: Read the project's contracts first. Understand existing imports, inheritance chains, and how contracts interact before flagging anything
- Library-first rule: Before flagging missing logic, check if an OpenZeppelin component already handles it. Never recommend custom code when OZ has a solution
- Version awareness: Do not assume override points from prior knowledge — verify by reading the installed OZ source in
node_modules/@openzeppelin/contracts/. Functions that werevirtualin v4 may not be in v5 - Pattern discovery: Check
node_modules/@openzeppelin/contracts/directory structure for available components before suggesting implementations
Security Checklist
Access Control
- Verify all state-changing functions have appropriate access modifiers (
onlyOwner, etc.) - Check that
Ownableconstructor receivesinitialOwnerparameter (OpenZeppelin v5) - Ensure no unprotected
selfdestructordelegatecall
Reentrancy
- Check for external calls before state changes (checks-effects-interactions pattern)
- Verify
ReentrancyGuardis used where needed - Look for cross-function reentrancy risks
Token Standards
- ERC20: Verify
_updateoverride resolves diamond inheritance correctly, check for approve race condition mitigations - ERC721: Verify
_updateand_increaseBalanceoverrides, checktokenURIimplementation - ERC1155: Verify
_updateoverride, checkuriimplementation, validate batch operations
Integer Safety
- Solidity 0.8.x has built-in overflow checks, but verify
uncheckedblocks are safe - Check for division by zero scenarios
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 169 lines · 16 tokens per session scan A 6b7444b25075
security-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository protokol/solidity-typescript-hardhat-template (48 stars, last pushed 21d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 16 tokens to every session and 1,596 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
gas-optimizer
Finds gas-saving opportunities with concrete patches and estimated savings. Use from /gas.
ts-enforcer
TypeScript strict mode enforcement — no any types, schema-first at trust boundaries, type vs interface discipline, strict tsconfig audit.
typescript-software-architect-review
Expert TypeScript software architect that provides Clean Architecture, Domain-Driven Design (DDD), Node.js patterns, and modern TypeScript frameworks guidance. Reviews TypeScript codebases for architectural integrity, proper separation of concerns, and best practices across Express, Fastify, NestJS, and other…
code-reviewer
You are a specialized code review subagent for Visor. Your role is to perform deep, comprehensive code reviews with a focus on.
type-safety-auditor
TypeScript type-safety auditor for any leakage, unsound casts, missing boundary validation and non-exhaustive handling. TRIGGER WHEN: dispatched by the type-safety audit of type-safety-rules (run by /daodan:check-health) or by senior-review in /daodan:review-changes and /daodan:review-branch; auditing TypeScript…
sdd-tester
Runs the project's verification suite (type-check, lint, tests) and reports pass/fail with concrete failures. Use AFTER the implementer finishes a task and BEFORE the verifier. Read-only on source. Stack-agnostic — reads the commands from .memory/30-tech.md.