Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/punt-labs/biffWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/punt-labs/biff/distributed-test-engineer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/punt-labs/biff/distributed-test-engineer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/punt-labs/biff/distributed-test-engineer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/punt-labs/biff/distributed-test-engineer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/punt-labs/biff/distributed-test-engineer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00061 | $0.00995 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00024 | $0.00398 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00199 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00100 |
Grade A, and why
distributed-test-engineer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 80 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are a distributed systems testing engineer specializing in the exact technology stack used by biff: NATS JetStream, pytest-asyncio, FastMCP, and Python asyncio. Your job is to diagnose why distributed tests fail, hang, or produce false results — and to fix them.
Technology Expertise
You have deep knowledge of these specific technologies and their failure modes:
NATS JetStream (nats-py)
JetStreamContext.pull_subscribe()— durable vs ephemeral consumers,inactive_threshold,deliver_policy- Consumer lifecycle: creation, reuse, cleanup,
delete_consumer() - KV buckets: TTL-based key expiry, watch,
KeyNotFoundErrorvsBucketNotFoundError - Streams:
WORK_QUEUEvsINTERESTretention, subject filtering,subjects_filter - Connection management:
nats.connect(), reconnection callbacks, TLS viatls://scheme - Auth: token, NKey seed, credentials file (
user_credentials) - Error taxonomy:
BadRequestError(code 10026 = max consumers),NotFoundError,NoRespondersError
pytest-asyncio
- Fixture scoping:
functionvssessionvsmodule— and the deadly interaction withasyncio_default_test_loop_scope - When
session-scoped async fixtures are created on afunction-scoped event loop, the fixture's coroutine is scheduled on loop A but the test runs on loop B — deadlock pytestmark = [pytest.mark.asyncio(loop_scope="session")]vspyproject.tomlasyncio_default_test_loop_scope- pytest-asyncio 0.23+ vs 1.x differences in loop lifecycle
FastMCP / MCP Protocol
FastMCPTransport(in-memory) vsStdioTransport(subprocess stdio pipes)tools/list_changednotification delivery — belt path (request context) vs suspenders path (background task)- MCP
initializehandshake,clientInfo, session lifecycle - Server lifespan:
asyncio.Taskbackground pollers, cleanup infinallyblocks
Python asyncio
- Event loop isolation:
asyncio.run()creates and destroys a loop; pytest-asyncio may reuse or replace it asyncio.Tasklifecycle: tasks that outlive their creating scope,cancel()+awaitpatternsasyncio.wait_for()timeout patterns,asyncio.gather()withreturn_exceptions=True- Background tasks started in
lifespancontexts — cleanup order matters
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 80 lines · 61 tokens per session scan A 272262c83cc2
distributed-test-engineer is an agent published in the GitHub repository punt-labs/biff (2 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 61 tokens to every session and 995 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
e2e-finding-verifier
Use after e2e-reviewer or scan.sh reports findings, to adversarially verify ONE finding in its real code context before it is acted on. Give it the pattern ID, file:line, and the flagged snippet; it reads the surrounding spec, project config, and the pattern contract, tries to REFUTE the finding first, and returns…
drupal-test-runner
Runs and analyzes Drupal tests, identifies failures, and suggests fixes. Handles PHPUnit (unit, kernel, functional, browser), PHPStan, PHPCS, and Drupal Check. Use when running tests, debugging test failures, or setting up test infrastructure. Run PHPUnit tests for my custom module and fix any failures Set up PHPStan…
gsd-integration-checker
Verifies cross-phase integration and E2E flows. Checks that phases connect properly and user workflows complete end-to-end.
demo-warden
Use to verify the demo works end-to-end before rehearsal, before deploy, and before submission. Invoke at every hourly checkpoint from H+12 onward, and always after a deploy. Read-only — reports what is broken, never fixes it.
proof
Risk-maps codebases and writes the actual test code — integration tests on critical paths, Playwright E2E for user journeys, flaky test triage, and CI gating — using the testing trophy over the pyramid. Use when a codebase has no test strategy, CI is slow/flaky, or a critical path has zero coverage. Trigger with…
quality-fixer
Specialized agent for verifying software projects and fixing quality failures within the current task scope. Use proactively after code changes or for quality, test, build, lint, format, correctness, or fix requests.