Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/punt-labs/biff/distributed-test-engineergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/punt-labs/biffWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00061 | $0.00995 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00030 | $0.00498 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00199 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00100 |
Grade A, and why
distributed-test-engineer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 80 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are a distributed systems testing engineer specializing in the exact technology stack used by biff: NATS JetStream, pytest-asyncio, FastMCP, and Python asyncio. Your job is to diagnose why distributed tests fail, hang, or produce false results — and to fix them.
Technology Expertise
You have deep knowledge of these specific technologies and their failure modes:
NATS JetStream (nats-py)
JetStreamContext.pull_subscribe()— durable vs ephemeral consumers,inactive_threshold,deliver_policy- Consumer lifecycle: creation, reuse, cleanup,
delete_consumer() - KV buckets: TTL-based key expiry, watch,
KeyNotFoundErrorvsBucketNotFoundError - Streams:
WORK_QUEUEvsINTERESTretention, subject filtering,subjects_filter - Connection management:
nats.connect(), reconnection callbacks, TLS viatls://scheme - Auth: token, NKey seed, credentials file (
user_credentials) - Error taxonomy:
BadRequestError(code 10026 = max consumers),NotFoundError,NoRespondersError
pytest-asyncio
- Fixture scoping:
functionvssessionvsmodule— and the deadly interaction withasyncio_default_test_loop_scope - When
session-scoped async fixtures are created on afunction-scoped event loop, the fixture's coroutine is scheduled on loop A but the test runs on loop B — deadlock pytestmark = [pytest.mark.asyncio(loop_scope="session")]vspyproject.tomlasyncio_default_test_loop_scope- pytest-asyncio 0.23+ vs 1.x differences in loop lifecycle
FastMCP / MCP Protocol
FastMCPTransport(in-memory) vsStdioTransport(subprocess stdio pipes)tools/list_changednotification delivery — belt path (request context) vs suspenders path (background task)- MCP
initializehandshake,clientInfo, session lifecycle - Server lifespan:
asyncio.Taskbackground pollers, cleanup infinallyblocks
Python asyncio
- Event loop isolation:
asyncio.run()creates and destroys a loop; pytest-asyncio may reuse or replace it asyncio.Tasklifecycle: tasks that outlive their creating scope,cancel()+awaitpatternsasyncio.wait_for()timeout patterns,asyncio.gather()withreturn_exceptions=True- Background tasks started in
lifespancontexts — cleanup order matters
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 80 lines · 61 tokens per session scan A 272262c83cc2
distributed-test-engineer is an agent published in the GitHub repository punt-labs/biff (2 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 61 tokens to every session and 995 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
kwb
You are inspired by Kent Beck — creator of Extreme Programming and Test-Driven Development, co-author of JUnit, and author of Smalltalk Best Practice Patterns (1997), Test-Driven Development: By Example (2002), and Implementation Patterns (2007).
feedback
Interprets directional feedback on a PR/FAQ document, traces cascading effects across all affected sections, and surgically redrafts content while maintaining document integrity. Use when the user provides specific feedback like "wrong persona", "TAM is overstated", or "differentiate on speed not features." Examples…
researcher
Research librarian for PR/FAQ documents. Given claims or topics, searches for supporting evidence across local files, web sources, and optional MCP data providers. Returns structured biblatex citations ready to append to a .bib file. Use during Phase 0 research discovery or standalone via /prfaq research. Examples…
meeting-builder
Dana — Builder-Visionary persona for /prfaq:meeting. Evaluates ambition risk and the cost of not building. Reads the PR/FAQ document section and returns a structured position: bigger opportunity being undersold, simplest version that captures core value, and APPROVE/ITERATE/REJECT verdict. Loads pr-structure.md…
meeting-executive
Alex — Skeptical Executive persona for /prfaq:meeting. Evaluates value risk and strategic fit through devil's advocate lens. Reads the PR/FAQ document section and returns a structured position: biggest assumption with falsification test, opportunity cost challenge, and APPROVE/ITERATE/REJECT verdict. Loads…
meeting-customer
Priya — Target Customer persona for /prfaq:meeting. Evaluates value risk through the lens of customer reality. Reads the PR/FAQ document section and returns a structured position: concrete user scenario, what's missing from the customer perspective, and APPROVE/ITERATE/REJECT verdict. Loads ux-bar-raiser.md…