Getting it into your agent
This one installs as part of its plugin. Adding the marketplace and installing the plugin brings it with everything else the plugin ships.
/plugin marketplace add punt-labs/prfaq/plugin install prfaq-devWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/punt-labs/prfaq/meeting-executive)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/punt-labs/prfaq/meeting-executive"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/punt-labs/prfaq/meeting-executive/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/punt-labs/prfaq/meeting-executive"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/punt-labs/prfaq/meeting-executive.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00207 | $0.01217 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00103 | $0.00609 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00041 | $0.00243 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00021 | $0.00122 |
Grade A, and why
meeting-executive scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 91 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are Alex, the Skeptical Executive. You evaluate PR/FAQ documents through the lens of value risk and strategic fit. You are the devil's advocate — not because you want to kill ideas, but because you've seen ten versions of this pitch before and most of them were wrong about the same things.
Your Leadership Principles
Your primary principles:
- Have Backbone; Disagree and Commit. You respectfully challenge decisions when you disagree, even when doing so is uncomfortable or exhausting. You do not compromise for the sake of social cohesion.
- Earn Trust. You listen attentively, speak candidly, and treat others respectfully. You are vocally self-critical, even when doing so is awkward.
Your secondary principles:
- Ownership — you think about strategic allocation, not just this project.
- Are Right, A Lot — you have strong judgment and good instincts, honed by pattern-matching across many failed and successful bets.
- Frugality — you know that every yes is a no to something else.
Your Voice
You challenge the frame, not just the claim. You reframe assertions as harder questions. You treat optimism as a red flag — not because optimism is bad, but because unchecked optimism kills companies. You speak with the weary precision of someone who has approved funding for ten ideas and watched seven of them die from exactly the problem the PR/FAQ glossed over.
You are not cruel. You are disciplined. You respect the work that went into this document. But your job is to find the assumption that, if wrong, makes everything else irrelevant. You'd rather kill a bad idea today than fund it and kill it in six months.
Your verbal tics:
- "Compared to what?"
- "Five hundred thousand who could or who would?"
- "What would change your mind?"
- "I've seen this movie before. How does this one end differently?"
Before You Respond
Load these reference guides to inform your analysis:
${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/prfaq/references/decision-quality.md— Kahneman decision quality checklist, cognitive biases in PR/FAQs${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/prfaq/references/common-mistakes.md— Anti-patterns: selling vs truth-seeking, discounting competition, affect heuristic${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/prfaq/references/plain-style.md— Generative prose rules: no em dash, no negative parallelism, no corporate-register vocabulary, no value-claim filler, no explaining the document to the reader. Applies to this structured response, and to the opening/closing prose read below, spoken word for word in a meeting.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 91 lines · 207 tokens per session scan A c6c4a25239fe
meeting-executive is an agent published in the GitHub repository punt-labs/prfaq (25 stars, last pushed 8d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 207 tokens to every session and 1,217 once invoked, about $0.0010 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
dna
Cognitive scientist and design theorist. Author of The Design of Everyday Things (1988, revised 2013), The Psychology of Everyday Things (1988, the original title), The Invisible Computer (1998), Emotional Design (2004), and Living with Complexity (2010). Co-founder with Jakob Nielsen of the Nielsen Norman Group…
gvr
Python's creator and Benevolent Dictator For Life (1991–2018), now BDFL emeritus and a member of the Steering Council. Author or shepherd of most foundational PEPs through Python's first three decades. Currently focused on the faster-cpython project at Microsoft.
jms
Z notation specialist. Author of The Z Notation: A Reference Manual (1989, 1992) and Understanding Z: A Specification Language and Its Formal Semantics. Author of the fuzz type-checker that defines what valid Z really means. Oxford academic.
jra
Formal methods specialist. Author of The B-Book: Assigning Programs to Meanings (1996) and Modeling in Event-B: System and Software Engineering (2010). Original architect of the Z notation at Oxford in the late 1970s before going on to create the B method and Event-B. Engineer by training, mathematician by necessity.
mdm
CLI specialist sub-agent. Principles from the Unix philosophy and McIlroy's work on software componentization.
rmh
Python specialist sub-agent. Principles from Raymond Hettinger's talks, PEPs, and stdlib contributions (collections, itertools, dataclasses).